What's in the name?
Anthony Carrico
(13 Dec 2023 19:37 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
siiky
(13 Dec 2023 20:09 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(13 Dec 2023 21:31 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
John Cowan
(13 Dec 2023 21:36 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Anthony Carrico
(13 Dec 2023 23:08 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(14 Dec 2023 14:11 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 Dec 2023 19:43 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(14 Dec 2023 20:12 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 Dec 2023 20:18 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Lassi Kortela
(14 Dec 2023 20:24 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(14 Dec 2023 20:27 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 Dec 2023 20:58 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name? Lassi Kortela (14 Dec 2023 21:01 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(14 Dec 2023 21:13 UTC)
|
Re: What's in the name?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 Dec 2023 21:19 UTC)
|
> If someone does the work of labeling all the existing SRFIs with > appropriate and helpful tags, I will expand the set of labels and update > the database. Won't the "Filter by keywords" drop-down menu on the https://srfi.schemers.org/ front page turn into a mess if the tags are too detailed? I suggested new kinds of tags (i.e. keywords) earlier on srfi-discuss and was told it's better to make my own index and post it on some other website. In retrospect, that was a good call.