What's in the name? Anthony Carrico (13 Dec 2023 19:37 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? siiky (13 Dec 2023 20:09 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (13 Dec 2023 21:31 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? John Cowan (13 Dec 2023 21:36 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Anthony Carrico (13 Dec 2023 23:08 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (14 Dec 2023 14:11 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Arthur A. Gleckler (14 Dec 2023 19:43 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (14 Dec 2023 20:12 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Arthur A. Gleckler (14 Dec 2023 20:18 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Lassi Kortela (14 Dec 2023 20:24 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (14 Dec 2023 20:27 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Arthur A. Gleckler (14 Dec 2023 20:58 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Lassi Kortela (14 Dec 2023 21:01 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (14 Dec 2023 21:13 UTC)
Re: What's in the name? Arthur A. Gleckler (14 Dec 2023 21:19 UTC)

Re: What's in the name? Lassi Kortela 14 Dec 2023 21:01 UTC

> If someone does the work of labeling all the existing SRFIs with
> appropriate and helpful tags, I will expand the set of labels and update
> the database.

Won't the "Filter by keywords" drop-down menu on the
https://srfi.schemers.org/ front page turn into a mess if the tags are
too detailed?

I suggested new kinds of tags (i.e. keywords) earlier on srfi-discuss
and was told it's better to make my own index and post it on some other
website. In retrospect, that was a good call.