On 12/14/23 07:11, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> What you'd like to achieve here (if I understand correctly) is
> evaluating f1 and f2 in parallel (on the same state).  SRFI 247 does not
> have a syntactic form tailored for this purpose, so you have to handle
> the state in local variables, in this case, manually.  It is just
> outside the scope of SRFI 247.

Ok thanks for the reply. I think I understand better the purpose of this
SRFI. Personally I probably wouldn't use it much. But it's a neat idea
and the implementation could probably be adapted to other usecases.

Good luck!