Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai 24 Jan 2004 22:15 UTC

>From: Tom Lord <xxxxxx@emf.net>
Subject: Re: strings draft
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:01:07 -0800 (PST)

> I specifically mean the R6RS recommendations to _not_ preclude that
> interpretation.  Yes, you should be able to read that string constant
> from some Unicode stream and wind up with a one character string
> constant.
>
> If someone writes a non-portable program that says "This program
> assumes that all string constants are Unicode [and, in such and such a
> canonicalization form, etc.]" then that program wouldn't necessarily
> run correctly on your implementation.

Ok.  That's reasonable.

--shiro