Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

A liitle note on the side felix (23 Jun 2004 23:44 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye (24 Jun 2004 00:14 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Alex Shinn (24 Jun 2004 03:10 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye (24 Jun 2004 03:55 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Jens Axel Søgaard (24 Jun 2004 05:04 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye (24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Felix Winkelmann (24 Jun 2004 05:19 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side campbell@xxxxxx (24 Jun 2004 16:56 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye (24 Jun 2004 18:47 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side campbell@xxxxxx (24 Jun 2004 04:19 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Alex Shinn (24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side campbell@xxxxxx (24 Jun 2004 01:40 UTC)

Re: A liitle note on the side campbell@xxxxxx 24 Jun 2004 04:33 UTC

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Alex Shinn wrote:

> I thought the "million line programs" discussion was useful.  Anything
> that big clearly needs dynamic-require, a superset of require.  It
> seems the Scheme48 module system is the one that needs to prove itself
> here.

Scheme48 has controlled & well-abstracted dynamic manipulation of the
module system.  DYNAMIC-REQUIRE is rather uncontrolled, inhibits
compilers in just the same way that LOAD does, and doesn't allow for
the same kind of first-class module system manipulation that Scheme48
does, so I think Scheme48 can be considered pretty well 'proven' in
this regard.