Re: A liitle note on the side
Alex Shinn 24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC
At Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:33:04 -0700 (PDT), xxxxxx@autodrip.bloodandcoffee.net wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Alex Shinn wrote:
>
> > I thought the "million line programs" discussion was useful. Anything
> > that big clearly needs dynamic-require, a superset of require. It
> > seems the Scheme48 module system is the one that needs to prove itself
> > here.
>
> Scheme48 has controlled & well-abstracted dynamic manipulation of the
> module system. DYNAMIC-REQUIRE is rather uncontrolled, inhibits
> compilers in just the same way that LOAD does, and doesn't allow for
> the same kind of first-class module system manipulation that Scheme48
> does, so I think Scheme48 can be considered pretty well 'proven' in
> this regard.
Ah, foolish me, I though the lack of any response to my previous post
on the subject meant everyone agreed with me :)
The canonical example of the million-line program is an OS kernel.
How do you implement an OS without some form of dynamic-require?
Or any large application with plugins?
--
Alex