|
A liitle note on the side
felix
(23 Jun 2004 23:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
Bradd W. Szonye
(24 Jun 2004 00:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
Alex Shinn
(24 Jun 2004 03:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
Bradd W. Szonye
(24 Jun 2004 03:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
Jens Axel Søgaard
(24 Jun 2004 05:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye (24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
Felix Winkelmann
(24 Jun 2004 05:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
campbell@xxxxxx
(24 Jun 2004 16:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
Bradd W. Szonye
(24 Jun 2004 18:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
campbell@xxxxxx
(24 Jun 2004 04:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
Alex Shinn
(24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: A liitle note on the side
campbell@xxxxxx
(24 Jun 2004 01:40 UTC)
|
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye 24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC
Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: > 5. Implement srfi-55 as a TeachPack, which means that there is no > visible REQUIRE in order to use REQUIRE-EXTENSION. Do Teachpacks work at all with MzScheme? How cumbersome are they to use? I'd be surprised to see it implemented that way; the vast majority of SRFIs are implemented as collections, even SRFI 7 (which is annoying). I don't see why this one would be treated any differently. -- Bradd W. Szonye http://www.szonye.com/bradd