|
arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(21 Oct 2005 14:53 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(21 Oct 2005 15:59 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
bear
(21 Oct 2005 16:39 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(22 Oct 2005 02:03 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: +nan.0 problems
bear
(24 Oct 2005 06:04 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 20:24 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 20:30 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 22:25 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 22:30 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(21 Oct 2005 17:15 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(21 Oct 2005 20:24 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(21 Oct 2005 20:32 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(22 Oct 2005 00:26 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(22 Oct 2005 00:45 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(22 Oct 2005 01:17 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(22 Oct 2005 01:22 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Bradley Lucier
(23 Oct 2005 19:46 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(23 Oct 2005 20:10 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(23 Oct 2005 19:54 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Jens Axel Søgaard
(23 Oct 2005 20:01 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(23 Oct 2005 20:50 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 21:12 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (23 Oct 2005 22:31 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 22:33 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 22:50 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 22:57 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 00:53 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 01:05 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 01:45 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:00 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 02:08 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:14 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 02:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:45 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 02:13 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:22 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 03:19 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 02:01 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(24 Oct 2005 02:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 03:14 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(24 Oct 2005 05:37 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Per Bothner
(24 Oct 2005 07:05 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 07:58 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 08:05 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 08:25 UTC)
|
||
|
reading NaNs
Aubrey Jaffer
(24 Oct 2005 15:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: reading NaNs
Per Bothner
(24 Oct 2005 17:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: reading NaNs
bear
(24 Oct 2005 19:23 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: reading NaNs
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 18:17 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
bear
(24 Oct 2005 06:13 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 06:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 07:49 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
bear
(24 Oct 2005 16:41 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 07:49 UTC)
|
||
Aubrey Jaffer <xxxxxx@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> So I would prefer the (/ 0. 0.) option because I think it will arise
> rarely, if ever.
The tradition of Lisp and Scheme is to use the same notation for
constants in the program source and for the textual representation
produced by the printer, as much as it's practical (i.e. excluding
objects which are "active" rather than being pure values).
Therefore I see no reason to reject as a NaN literal the same textual
form which is used when it's printed.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ xxxxxx@knm.org.pl
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/