|
arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(21 Oct 2005 14:53 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(21 Oct 2005 15:59 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
bear
(21 Oct 2005 16:39 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(22 Oct 2005 01:17 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(22 Oct 2005 01:22 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Bradley Lucier
(23 Oct 2005 19:46 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(23 Oct 2005 20:10 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(23 Oct 2005 19:54 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Jens Axel Søgaard
(23 Oct 2005 20:01 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(23 Oct 2005 20:50 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 21:12 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 22:31 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 22:33 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 22:50 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 22:57 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 00:53 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 01:05 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 01:45 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:00 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 02:08 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:14 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 02:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:45 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 02:13 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues Taylor Campbell (24 Oct 2005 02:22 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 03:19 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 02:01 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(24 Oct 2005 02:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 03:14 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(24 Oct 2005 05:37 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Per Bothner
(24 Oct 2005 07:05 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 07:58 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 08:05 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 08:25 UTC)
|
||
|
reading NaNs
Aubrey Jaffer
(24 Oct 2005 15:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: reading NaNs
Per Bothner
(24 Oct 2005 17:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: reading NaNs
bear
(24 Oct 2005 19:23 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: reading NaNs
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 18:17 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
bear
(24 Oct 2005 06:13 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 06:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 07:49 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
bear
(24 Oct 2005 16:41 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 07:49 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(22 Oct 2005 02:03 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: +nan.0 problems
bear
(24 Oct 2005 06:04 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 20:24 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 20:30 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 22:25 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 22:30 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(21 Oct 2005 17:15 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(21 Oct 2005 20:24 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(21 Oct 2005 20:32 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(22 Oct 2005 00:26 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(22 Oct 2005 00:45 UTC)
|
||
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:12:39 -0500 From: Alan Watson <xxxxxx@astrosmo.unam.mx> Taylor Campbell wrote: > NaN is *not* a numeric result; it's not a number! It represents the > condition of a computation whose meaning is undefined; it's not a > defined result. Your statements about NaNs are correct in the context of mathematical numbers but not in the context of IEEE floating point numbers. I'm definitely not an expert on IEEE 754, and I'd not trust myself to argue anything regarding detailed semantics of it, but I think it's pretty plain & straightforward that what NaN represents is not a number due to an undefined mathematical operation. Can you elaborate on what you meant here?
