arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(21 Oct 2005 14:53 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(21 Oct 2005 15:59 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
bear
(21 Oct 2005 16:39 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(22 Oct 2005 01:17 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(22 Oct 2005 02:03 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: +nan.0 problems
bear
(24 Oct 2005 06:04 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 20:24 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 20:30 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 22:25 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 22:30 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(21 Oct 2005 17:15 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(21 Oct 2005 20:24 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(21 Oct 2005 20:32 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(22 Oct 2005 00:26 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(22 Oct 2005 00:45 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(22 Oct 2005 01:22 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Bradley Lucier
(23 Oct 2005 19:46 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(23 Oct 2005 20:10 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(23 Oct 2005 19:54 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Jens Axel Søgaard
(23 Oct 2005 20:01 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(23 Oct 2005 20:50 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 21:12 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 22:31 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 22:33 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Oct 2005 22:50 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(23 Oct 2005 22:57 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 00:53 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 01:05 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 01:45 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:00 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 02:08 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:14 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 02:27 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:45 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 02:13 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 02:22 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 03:19 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 02:01 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(24 Oct 2005 02:27 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 03:14 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(24 Oct 2005 05:37 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Per Bothner
(24 Oct 2005 07:05 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 07:58 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 08:05 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Alan Watson
(24 Oct 2005 08:25 UTC)
|
||
reading NaNs
Aubrey Jaffer
(24 Oct 2005 15:35 UTC)
|
||
Re: reading NaNs Per Bothner (24 Oct 2005 17:35 UTC)
|
||
Re: reading NaNs
bear
(24 Oct 2005 19:23 UTC)
|
||
Re: reading NaNs
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(24 Oct 2005 18:17 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
bear
(24 Oct 2005 06:13 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Taylor Campbell
(24 Oct 2005 06:27 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 07:49 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
bear
(24 Oct 2005 16:41 UTC)
|
||
Re: arithmetic issues
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(24 Oct 2005 07:49 UTC)
|
Aubrey Jaffer wrote: > | Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:25:09 -0500 > | From: Alan Watson <xxxxxx@astrosmo.unam.mx> > | > | NaNs are atoms -- they have no context or stucture, just a single > | value. > > In an implementation which boxes flonums, NaNs aren't a single value; > EQ? and EQV? are *not* guaranteed to return #t given two NaNs. eq? is not guaranteed to return #t given two equal flonums eqv? *is* guaranteed to return #t given two equal flonums. NaNs should be the same: two NaNs that have the same bit-pattern and size must compare as eqv? but not necessarily eq?. -- --Per Bothner xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/