Date Index - April 2006 - srfi-91@srfi.schemers.org

13 Apr 2006 17:54 UTC	Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Ben Goetter
13 Apr 2006 18:04 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	John Cowan
13 Apr 2006 21:41 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Marc Feeley
13 Apr 2006 22:03 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Marc Feeley
14 Apr 2006 01:01 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Ben Goetter
14 Apr 2006 01:52 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Marc Feeley
14 Apr 2006 12:26 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	John Cowan
14 Apr 2006 12:49 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	John Cowan
14 Apr 2006 13:37 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Marc Feeley
14 Apr 2006 13:41 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Marc Feeley
14 Apr 2006 13:57 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	John Cowan
14 Apr 2006 14:07 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Marc Feeley
14 Apr 2006 14:53 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Taylor R. Campbell
14 Apr 2006 15:29 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	John Cowan
14 Apr 2006 15:48 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	John Cowan
14 Apr 2006 16:19 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Marc Feeley
14 Apr 2006 19:22 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
14 Apr 2006 19:51 UTC	Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?	Marc Feeley