Thread Index - April 2006 - srfi-91@srfi.schemers.org

Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Ben Goetter (13 Apr 2006 17:54 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (13 Apr 2006 18:04 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (13 Apr 2006 21:41 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (14 Apr 2006 12:49 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (14 Apr 2006 13:37 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (14 Apr 2006 13:41 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (14 Apr 2006 13:57 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (14 Apr 2006 14:07 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (14 Apr 2006 15:29 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Taylor R. Campbell (14 Apr 2006 14:53 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (14 Apr 2006 15:49 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (14 Apr 2006 16:20 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (14 Apr 2006 19:22 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (14 Apr 2006 19:51 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (13 Apr 2006 22:03 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Ben Goetter (14 Apr 2006 01:02 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (14 Apr 2006 01:52 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (14 Apr 2006 12:26 UTC)