(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: Proposal to add HTML class attributes to SRFIs to aid machine-parsing Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (06 Mar 2019 10:12 UTC)
Re: Proposal to add HTML class attributes to SRFIs to aid machine-parsing Per Bothner (06 Mar 2019 18:12 UTC)

Re: Proposal to add HTML class attributes to SRFIs to aid machine-parsing Per Bothner 06 Mar 2019 18:11 UTC

On 3/6/19 9:58 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:

> (D)  procedure or syntax definition in a way that is machine readable
> and from which "signatures" could be extracted;
> [and here is where our differences lie;  you want to use HTML to mark
> them, and I say it is overkill and should be "moved" to a dedicated
> file or section, not necessarily part of the actual SRFI document;]

Besides extracting meta-data into an index, we want to be able to link
from the index to the location in the specification, marked by an id attribute.
So you need at least some meta-data in the html file.  Plus you want to
mark up the definition for styling purposes anyway.  So just use the html
file as the canonical location of the meta-data.
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/