(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: Proposal to add HTML class attributes to SRFIs to aid machine-parsing Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (06 Mar 2019 10:12 UTC)
Re: Proposal to add HTML class attributes to SRFIs to aid machine-parsing Ciprian Dorin Craciun (06 Mar 2019 18:35 UTC)

Re: Proposal to add HTML class attributes to SRFIs to aid machine-parsing Ciprian Dorin Craciun 06 Mar 2019 18:34 UTC

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 8:22 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
> However, if you'd like to pick the same ones, that's fine, or you could work on SRFI 1, which is one of the most, if not the most, widely implemented SRFIs.  It's big, though, so there's no need to finish the entire markup.

I think we should all try to work on SRFI-1.  As you've said it's the
one most likely found in other documentations, and it will provide
plenty of opportunities to experiment.

Ciprian.