> I think I prefer the SPDX comments inside the .gitgnore file though,
> even if just for uniformity with the rest.

I've expressed my opinion. The rest of you can vote on it.

>> Comments in .html files should probably go below the <html> tag. See
>> e.g.https://stackoverflow.com/questions/941100/can-comments-appear-before-the-doctype-declaration

Does the reuse tool place HTML comments before the <html> tag? That
should probably be fixed in the tool.

>> for more natural looking notices. E.g.
>>
>> # Copyright 2015 Arthur A. Gleckler<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

> I left the reuse tool take care of producing these (using something like
> "reuse annotate -lMIT -y2015 -c'Arthur A. Gleckler<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>' .gitignore")
>
> When there are multiple copyright holders, they are grouped together as
> in:
>
> # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2015 Some One <email1>
> # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2018 Another One <email2>
> #
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>
> I don't feel strongly about it; I prefer to stick to what the tool
> produces as it makes my life easier.

This works: reuse annotate example.scm --copyright "Some One" --license
MIT --copyright-style string --merge-copyrights

It produces:

; Copyright 2023 Some One
;
; SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

It uses ";" instead of the more sensible ";;" or ";;;".

To get rid of the blank line, it seems we would have to use a custom
template that has to be copied into each SRFI's repo. Unwieldy.