> I think I prefer the SPDX comments inside the .gitgnore file though, > even if just for uniformity with the rest. I've expressed my opinion. The rest of you can vote on it. >> Comments in .html files should probably go below the <html> tag. See >> e.g.https://stackoverflow.com/questions/941100/can-comments-appear-before-the-doctype-declaration Does the reuse tool place HTML comments before the <html> tag? That should probably be fixed in the tool. >> for more natural looking notices. E.g. >> >> # Copyright 2015 Arthur A. Gleckler<xxxxxx@speechcode.com> >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT > I left the reuse tool take care of producing these (using something like > "reuse annotate -lMIT -y2015 -c'Arthur A. Gleckler<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>' .gitignore") > > When there are multiple copyright holders, they are grouped together as > in: > > # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2015 Some One <email1> > # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2018 Another One <email2> > # > # SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT > > I don't feel strongly about it; I prefer to stick to what the tool > produces as it makes my life easier. This works: reuse annotate example.scm --copyright "Some One" --license MIT --copyright-style string --merge-copyrights It produces: ; Copyright 2023 Some One ; ; SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT It uses ";" instead of the more sensible ";;" or ";;;". To get rid of the blank line, it seems we would have to use a custom template that has to be copied into each SRFI's repo. Unwieldy.
