How does sourcehut compare to gitlab (which would be another option)?

Marc

> On Apr 25, 2021, at 3:27 PM, Amirouche <xxxxxx@hyper.dev> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021-04-25 20:56, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:51 AM Amirouche <xxxxxx@hyper.dev>
>> wrote:
>>> I want to setup a sourcehut instance for the community.
>>> ref: the hacker forge https://sr.ht/
>
>
>> I'm just
>> wondering because they have notices up that describe it as "alpha
>> quality."
>
> It is alpha maybe in terms of features, the quality of
> existing features is good. From time to time they are bugs.
>
> Here are the bugs for the ML service:
>
> - https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/lists.sr.ht
>
> Here are the bugs for the git service:
>
> - https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/git.sr.ht
>
> Also build service:
>
> - https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/builds.sr.ht
>
> I really like the build service. And if you are the owner,
> you can add whatever docker image you want.
>
> Also, they might not be ready for web-scale.
>
>> That looks interesting.  Have you used it in a real project?
>
> I have some solo projects there https://sr.ht/~amirouche/
>
> I follow several mailing lists with one that has a lot of traffic.
>
> I have no use for the wiki, I tried the issue tracker it works.
>
> My favorite features are the mailling list service, and the build / ci service.
>
> It is coded with Python and Go.
>
> The UI/UX is much cleaner, less confusing than github or gitlab.
>
> FWIW, from a social (!) perspective it is missing favorites
> or watch this project. But there is RSS / ATOM feeds. Also, it
> has an API, including OAUTH, and a mechanism to interop with
> other systems called dispatch. The other major feature that is
> missing and not planned is pull-request / merge request. Patches
> should be sent to a mailing list with git-send. But it is possible
> to create you own service and interop, if there is a need.
>
>
>