Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic

Show/hide message thread

Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy Bill Birch (22 May 2013 15:03 UTC)

Re: Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy David A. Wheeler (23 May 2013 13:39 UTC)

sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (23 May 2013 16:08 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (23 May 2013 16:19 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (23 May 2013 16:32 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (24 May 2013 03:55 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (24 May 2013 03:12 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (24 May 2013 15:34 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (24 May 2013 20:02 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (24 May 2013 20:09 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (24 May 2013 21:35 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (24 May 2013 22:40 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (24 May 2013 23:13 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (25 May 2013 03:43 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (25 May 2013 03:20 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (25 May 2013 04:17 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (25 May 2013 04:27 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (25 May 2013 04:55 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (25 May 2013 18:14 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (26 May 2013 23:26 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 00:29 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (27 May 2013 15:51 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alan Manuel Gloria (28 May 2013 04:28 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (28 May 2013 18:34 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (26 May 2013 20:40 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (26 May 2013 22:43 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 00:00 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alexey Radul (27 May 2013 03:32 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 04:44 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alexey Radul (27 May 2013 05:50 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alan Manuel Gloria (27 May 2013 06:34 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 15:14 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 13:55 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alexey Radul (27 May 2013 16:27 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (27 May 2013 15:55 UTC)

RE: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Jos Koot (27 May 2013 04:57 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 13:37 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (27 May 2013 15:50 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan 24 May 2013 20:02 UTC

John David Stone scripsit:

> But it is also true that Python programs are more difficult to read
> and to edit than they would have been if the designer had chosen to
> use explicit grouping symbols.

That claim really requires evidence to be taken seriously.

--
How comes city and country to be filled with drones         John Cowan
and rogues, our highways with hackers, and all          xxxxxx@ccil.org
places with sloth and wickedness?           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
                --W. Blith, Eng. Improver Improved, 1652