|
Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy
Bill Birch
(22 May 2013 15:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy
David A. Wheeler
(23 May 2013 13:39 UTC)
|
|
sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John David Stone
(23 May 2013 16:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John Cowan
(23 May 2013 16:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John David Stone
(23 May 2013 16:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(24 May 2013 03:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(24 May 2013 03:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John David Stone
(24 May 2013 15:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John Cowan
(24 May 2013 20:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(24 May 2013 20:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John David Stone
(24 May 2013 21:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(24 May 2013 22:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John David Stone
(24 May 2013 23:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(25 May 2013 03:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (25 May 2013 03:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(25 May 2013 04:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(25 May 2013 04:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John Cowan
(25 May 2013 04:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(25 May 2013 18:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John David Stone
(26 May 2013 23:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(27 May 2013 00:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John David Stone
(27 May 2013 15:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
Alan Manuel Gloria
(28 May 2013 04:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(28 May 2013 18:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
(26 May 2013 20:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(26 May 2013 22:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(27 May 2013 00:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
Alexey Radul
(27 May 2013 03:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(27 May 2013 04:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
Alexey Radul
(27 May 2013 05:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
Alan Manuel Gloria
(27 May 2013 06:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(27 May 2013 15:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(27 May 2013 13:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
Alexey Radul
(27 May 2013 16:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John Cowan
(27 May 2013 15:55 UTC)
|
|
RE: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
Jos Koot
(27 May 2013 04:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
David A. Wheeler
(27 May 2013 13:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic
John Cowan
(27 May 2013 15:50 UTC)
|
David A. Wheeler scripsit:
> We can argue about Icon and Occam and Haskell, but that's not really
> the point.
Is this some other Icon than
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icon_(programming_language)>? Because that
language is definitely not indentation sensitive: it uses semicolons
like Pascal (separators, not terminators) and braces like C.
--
XQuery Blueberry DOM John Cowan
Entity parser dot-com xxxxxx@ccil.org
Abstract schemata http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
XPointer errata
Infoset Unicode BOM --Richard Tobin