Re: New draft of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library
William D Clinger 21 May 2016 06:53 UTC
Alex Shinn wrote:
> The one known bug in the chibi impl has been fixed.
Chibi's 130.scm contains a call to string-cursor<? that's
missing its first argument. That corresponds to a systematic
error in the foof sample implementation: foof-shim.scm defines
string-cursor<? as a synonym for <, and likewise for the other
cursor comparisons.
I haven't downloaded any implementations of (srfi 130) yet, so
I haven't done any testing. I was just looking to see whether
I could use one of the sample implementations or would need to
roll my own.
Will