John Cowan wrote:

> I'll patch it up this evening.

If you're repairing SRFI 130 itself, I have a couple more
corrections.

The example given for string-for-each-cursor is incorrect.
It calls string-ref with a cursor as second argument, so that
should be a call to string-ref/cursor.  It is also missing
the last line of the expression, which was probably a copy
error.  The expression should be

    (let ((s "abcde") (v '()))
      (string-for-each-cursor
       (lambda (cur)
         (set! v (cons (char->integer (string-ref/cursor s cur)) v)))
       s)
      v)

In the description of string-index, second paragraph, it
should be possible to improve upon "a same half-open interval
[start,end) in these procedures that they do in all the other
SRFI 130 procedures."

It might be good to have an incompatibility note for the four
procedures starting with string-index, saying they are not
compatible with the SRFI 13 procedures of the same names
because the SRFI 13 procedures sometimes return false.

The compatibility note for string-replicate refers to "the
string-replicate procedure of SRFI 13", but there's no such
thing.  I think it should refer to the xsubstring procedure
of SRFI 13.

Will