Re: New draft of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library Alex Shinn 21 May 2016 16:38 UTC
I totally missed that - the chibi versions have never taken an initial string argument to string-cursor</>[=]?. Do we really need it? -- Alex On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 3:53 PM, William D Clinger <xxxxxx@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > Alex Shinn wrote: > >> The one known bug in the chibi impl has been fixed. > > Chibi's 130.scm contains a call to string-cursor<? that's > missing its first argument. That corresponds to a systematic > error in the foof sample implementation: foof-shim.scm defines > string-cursor<? as a synonym for <, and likewise for the other > cursor comparisons. > > I haven't downloaded any implementations of (srfi 130) yet, so > I haven't done any testing. I was just looking to see whether > I could use one of the sample implementations or would need to > roll my own. > > Will