I totally missed that - the chibi versions have never taken
an initial string argument to string-cursor</>[=]?.  Do we
really need it?

--
Alex

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 3:53 PM, William D Clinger <xxxxxx@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> Alex Shinn wrote:
>
>> The one known bug in the chibi impl has been fixed.
>
> Chibi's 130.scm contains a call to string-cursor<? that's
> missing its first argument.  That corresponds to a systematic
> error in the foof sample implementation: foof-shim.scm defines
> string-cursor<? as a synonym for <, and likewise for the other
> cursor comparisons.
>
> I haven't downloaded any implementations of (srfi 130) yet, so
> I haven't done any testing.  I was just looking to see whether
> I could use one of the sample implementations or would need to
> roll my own.
>
> Will