Re: New draft of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library William D Clinger 21 May 2016 06:53 UTC

Alex Shinn wrote:

> The one known bug in the chibi impl has been fixed.

Chibi's 130.scm contains a call to string-cursor<? that's
missing its first argument.  That corresponds to a systematic
error in the foof sample implementation: foof-shim.scm defines
string-cursor<? as a synonym for <, and likewise for the other
cursor comparisons.

I haven't downloaded any implementations of (srfi 130) yet, so
I haven't done any testing.  I was just looking to see whether
I could use one of the sample implementations or would need to
roll my own.

Will