Re: New draft of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library William D Clinger 21 May 2016 06:53 UTC
Alex Shinn wrote: > The one known bug in the chibi impl has been fixed. Chibi's 130.scm contains a call to string-cursor<? that's missing its first argument. That corresponds to a systematic error in the foof sample implementation: foof-shim.scm defines string-cursor<? as a synonym for <, and likewise for the other cursor comparisons. I haven't downloaded any implementations of (srfi 130) yet, so I haven't done any testing. I was just looking to see whether I could use one of the sample implementations or would need to roll my own. Will