|
SRFI 181: Custom ports
Arthur A. Gleckler
(16 Feb 2020 08:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Lassi Kortela
(16 Feb 2020 14:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Lassi Kortela
(21 Feb 2020 23:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
John Cowan
(22 Feb 2020 19:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Vincent Manis
(17 Feb 2020 23:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
John Cowan
(18 Feb 2020 17:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Arthur A. Gleckler
(18 Feb 2020 18:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
John Cowan
(19 Feb 2020 12:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Arthur A. Gleckler
(19 Feb 2020 18:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Lassi Kortela
(19 Feb 2020 18:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Arthur A. Gleckler
(19 Feb 2020 18:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Lassi Kortela
(19 Feb 2020 18:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Arthur A. Gleckler
(19 Feb 2020 18:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Vincent Manis
(19 Feb 2020 22:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Jim Rees
(04 Mar 2020 12:36 UTC)
|
|
u8-ready? and char-ready?
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 12:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Jim Rees
(04 Mar 2020 13:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 13:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Jim Rees
(04 Mar 2020 14:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Marc Feeley
(04 Mar 2020 15:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 15:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Marc Feeley
(04 Mar 2020 15:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(04 Mar 2020 15:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Marc Feeley
(04 Mar 2020 15:49 UTC)
|
|
SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 16:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 16:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Marc Feeley
(04 Mar 2020 16:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 16:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 16:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Marc Feeley
(04 Mar 2020 16:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 17:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
John Cowan
(04 Mar 2020 23:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Marc Feeley
(05 Mar 2020 13:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
John Cowan
(05 Mar 2020 20:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Göran Weinholt
(05 Mar 2020 22:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
John Cowan
(05 Mar 2020 22:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes
Arthur A. Gleckler
(04 Mar 2020 19:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 15:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Marc Feeley
(04 Mar 2020 15:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Jim Rees
(04 Mar 2020 15:32 UTC)
|
|
Waiting on custom ports / CL Gray Streams
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 15:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
John Cowan
(04 Mar 2020 17:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Lassi Kortela
(04 Mar 2020 17:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?
Marc Feeley
(04 Mar 2020 14:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Jim Rees
(04 Mar 2020 19:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
John Cowan
(05 Mar 2020 00:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
Jim Rees
(05 Mar 2020 21:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports
John Cowan
(05 Mar 2020 22:08 UTC)
|
> I think the I/O methods should be extended with the following features > > 1) a “transfer up to N bytes/characters that are currently available” method that returns the number of bytes/characters that have been transferred (0 when nothing is available) > > 2) a “transfer at least N bytes/characters” method with an optional timeout parameter indicating how long to wait for N bytes to become available, and return the number of bytes transferred > > These could probably be combined in the same method with many parameters. Are you suggesting these for SRFI 181 specifically, or for Scheme in general?
