Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(15 Sep 2020 15:35 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(15 Sep 2020 19:13 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(16 Sep 2020 01:54 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(16 Sep 2020 02:49 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(16 Sep 2020 05:50 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(16 Sep 2020 06:19 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(16 Sep 2020 16:11 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(16 Sep 2020 16:15 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 04:00 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(17 Sep 2020 05:49 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 06:04 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Sep 2020 07:00 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 07:08 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Sep 2020 07:14 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 07:22 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Sep 2020 07:25 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 07:50 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Sep 2020 08:00 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 08:04 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(17 Sep 2020 16:47 UTC)
|
Am Do., 17. Sept. 2020 um 09:22 Uhr schrieb Vladimir Nikishkin <xxxxxx@gmail.com>: > > This is an optional procedure anyway. > The specification does not prohibit the implementation from > implementing proper Bezier curves. > > "It is not an error to supply more than one <code>vecI</code>, but this > SRFI does not specify an exact behaviour." is what the latest draft says. That does not make sense to me, given the idea of this SRFI.