Withdrawal?
John Cowan
(24 Oct 2020 20:54 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Oct 2020 20:58 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
John Cowan
(24 Oct 2020 21:04 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Oct 2020 21:10 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
John Cowan
(24 Oct 2020 22:20 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Emmanuel Medernach
(25 Oct 2020 15:44 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(25 Oct 2020 19:32 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Emmanuel Medernach
(25 Oct 2020 20:41 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(25 Oct 2020 20:54 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Emmanuel Medernach
(26 Oct 2020 20:47 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Emmanuel Medernach
(26 Oct 2020 21:08 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(26 Oct 2020 21:33 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Emmanuel Medernach
(27 Oct 2020 08:01 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(27 Oct 2020 08:57 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Emmanuel Medernach
(27 Oct 2020 20:44 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(25 Oct 2020 01:53 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(25 Oct 2020 07:56 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
John Cowan
(25 Oct 2020 14:40 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (26 Oct 2020 18:07 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(26 Oct 2020 18:12 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
John Cowan
(26 Oct 2020 22:19 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(27 Oct 2020 01:17 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
John Cowan
(27 Oct 2020 02:30 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(27 Oct 2020 07:01 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(28 Oct 2020 16:53 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
John Cowan
(28 Oct 2020 18:35 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(28 Oct 2020 18:38 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Lucier, Bradley J
(28 Oct 2020 18:37 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(27 Oct 2020 06:58 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(27 Oct 2020 17:37 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(27 Oct 2020 20:17 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(27 Oct 2020 22:30 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(27 Oct 2020 23:49 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(28 Oct 2020 06:17 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
John Cowan
(28 Oct 2020 15:09 UTC)
|
Re: Withdrawal?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(28 Oct 2020 17:04 UTC)
|
On 2020-10-25 10:40 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > However, I'm thinking that it would be better to write a direct C > implementation and then provide a sample of FFI glue required to get the > information in and out of Scheme. That way we escape all dependency on > bytevectors and deal only with floats, doubles, and ints across the > Scheme/C boundary. I don't know if you are up for doing that. I'm not sure I want to commit to writing something like that, since I can't immediately visualize how much work it would be. How much of a Scheme number system should we assume in order to write a good example of this concept? Would it be sufficient to provide C versions of nan-quiet?, nan-negative?, etc., operating on doubles? This would be fairly easy to wrap, I suppose, although my only FFI experience has been with Chibi. -- Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz> "Abstraction lies at the heart of all programming languages." --Greg Michaelson