On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:53:19PM -0800, bear wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 xxxxxx@freenetproject.org wrote:
>
> >So basically you want to drop all these useful types because they don't
> >exist yet?  That makes so much sense.
>
> You're just trolling here, aren't you?
>
> Things that don't exist aren't useful.  EVER.

Only if they never exist.  By your rationale, the authors should never
have specified call/cc.  After all, no Scheme implementations existed
yet, so how is it useful?

<personal attacks: snip>

	Scott