Re: A possible solution?

Show/hide message thread

Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 20:35 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (28 Oct 2003 21:24 UTC)

RE: Reasons for withdrawal Anton van Straaten (28 Oct 2003 22:05 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 22:36 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 22:44 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 23:22 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 02:50 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 03:19 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 03:31 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 03:38 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 04:36 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 05:02 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 05:32 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Taylor Campbell (28 Oct 2003 22:56 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Taylor Campbell (28 Oct 2003 23:06 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 23:16 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 23:28 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 23:42 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 00:13 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 01:00 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 01:41 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 03:03 UTC)

RE: Reasons for withdrawal Anton van Straaten (29 Oct 2003 05:31 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 05:54 UTC)

RE: Reasons for withdrawal Anton van Straaten (29 Oct 2003 06:40 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 06:44 UTC)

RE: Reasons for withdrawal Anton van Straaten (29 Oct 2003 07:31 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 07:34 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Thien-Thi Nguyen (29 Oct 2003 14:08 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 21:28 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 22:02 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 22:22 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Jim White (28 Oct 2003 22:15 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 01:25 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 01:44 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 04:10 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 04:53 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 05:10 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 05:17 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 05:31 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 01:49 UTC)

API conflicts (Was: Re: Reasons for withdrawal) Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 05:48 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 06:03 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 17:40 UTC)

Re: API conflicts (Was: Re: Reasons for withdrawal) Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 06:03 UTC)

Re: API conflicts (Was: Re: Reasons for withdrawal) scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 14:19 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 22:25 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 22:41 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Taylor Campbell (29 Oct 2003 23:58 UTC)

Re: API conflicts (Was: Re: Reasons for withdrawal) Taylor Campbell (29 Oct 2003 21:40 UTC)

A possible solution? bear (29 Oct 2003 22:59 UTC)

RE: A possible solution? Anton van Straaten (30 Oct 2003 07:40 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 10:07 UTC)

RE: A possible solution? bear (30 Oct 2003 15:13 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 15:20 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 15:27 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 15:39 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 15:43 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 16:11 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? bear (30 Oct 2003 17:02 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Tom Lord (30 Oct 2003 19:58 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 20:15 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? bear (30 Oct 2003 20:53 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 21:07 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Taylor Campbell (30 Oct 2003 21:08 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 21:11 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 21:17 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? bear (30 Oct 2003 23:11 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Alex Shinn (31 Oct 2003 03:03 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 23:19 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 00:26 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 05:32 UTC)

Re: API conflicts bear (30 Oct 2003 06:22 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 06:23 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 13:54 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 14:01 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 14:16 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 14:29 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 14:58 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 15:22 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 01:50 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Alex Shinn (29 Oct 2003 03:06 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 03:18 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 03:29 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 03:37 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Alex Shinn (29 Oct 2003 06:16 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 14:25 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Alex Shinn (30 Oct 2003 02:19 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 04:42 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Alex Shinn (30 Oct 2003 06:22 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx 30 Oct 2003 21:06 UTC

Show/hide attachments

On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:53:19PM -0800, bear wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 xxxxxx@freenetproject.org wrote:
>
> >So basically you want to drop all these useful types because they don't
> >exist yet?  That makes so much sense.
>
> You're just trolling here, aren't you?
>
> Things that don't exist aren't useful.  EVER.

Only if they never exist.  By your rationale, the authors should never
have specified call/cc.  After all, no Scheme implementations existed
yet, so how is it useful?

<personal attacks: snip>

	Scott