Re: A possible solution? | Simplelists

Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 20:35 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (28 Oct 2003 21:24 UTC)

RE: Reasons for withdrawal Anton van Straaten (28 Oct 2003 22:05 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 22:36 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 22:44 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 23:22 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 02:50 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 03:19 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 03:31 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 03:38 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 04:36 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 05:02 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 05:32 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Taylor Campbell (28 Oct 2003 22:56 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Taylor Campbell (28 Oct 2003 23:06 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 23:16 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 23:28 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 23:42 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 00:13 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 01:00 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 01:41 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 03:03 UTC)

RE: Reasons for withdrawal Anton van Straaten (29 Oct 2003 05:31 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 05:54 UTC)

RE: Reasons for withdrawal Anton van Straaten (29 Oct 2003 06:40 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 06:44 UTC)

RE: Reasons for withdrawal Anton van Straaten (29 Oct 2003 07:31 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 07:34 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Thien-Thi Nguyen (29 Oct 2003 14:08 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 21:28 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 22:02 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 22:22 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Jim White (28 Oct 2003 22:15 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 01:25 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 01:44 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 04:10 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 04:53 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 05:10 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 05:17 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 05:31 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 01:49 UTC)

API conflicts (Was: Re: Reasons for withdrawal) Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 05:48 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 06:03 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 17:40 UTC)

Re: API conflicts (Was: Re: Reasons for withdrawal) Bradd W. Szonye (29 Oct 2003 06:03 UTC)

Re: API conflicts (Was: Re: Reasons for withdrawal) scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 14:19 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 22:25 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 22:41 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Taylor Campbell (29 Oct 2003 23:58 UTC)

Re: API conflicts (Was: Re: Reasons for withdrawal) Taylor Campbell (29 Oct 2003 21:40 UTC)

A possible solution? bear (29 Oct 2003 22:59 UTC)

RE: A possible solution? Anton van Straaten (30 Oct 2003 07:40 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 10:07 UTC)

RE: A possible solution? bear (30 Oct 2003 15:13 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 15:20 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 15:27 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 15:39 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 15:43 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 16:11 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? bear (30 Oct 2003 17:02 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Tom Lord (30 Oct 2003 19:58 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 20:15 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? bear (30 Oct 2003 20:53 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 21:07 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Taylor Campbell (30 Oct 2003 21:08 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 21:11 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 21:17 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? bear (30 Oct 2003 23:11 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? Alex Shinn (31 Oct 2003 03:03 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Shiro Kawai (29 Oct 2003 23:19 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 00:26 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 05:32 UTC)

Re: API conflicts bear (30 Oct 2003 06:22 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 06:23 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 13:54 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 14:01 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 14:16 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 14:29 UTC)

Re: API conflicts scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 14:58 UTC)

Re: API conflicts Bradd W. Szonye (30 Oct 2003 15:22 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 01:50 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Alex Shinn (29 Oct 2003 03:06 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 03:18 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Tom Lord (29 Oct 2003 03:29 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 03:37 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Alex Shinn (29 Oct 2003 06:16 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2003 14:25 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Alex Shinn (30 Oct 2003 02:19 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 04:42 UTC)

Re: Reasons for withdrawal Alex Shinn (30 Oct 2003 06:22 UTC)

Re: A possible solution? scgmille@xxxxxx 30 Oct 2003 21:17 UTC

Show/hide attachments

On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:11:45PM -0800, Bradd W. Szonye wrote:
> Taylor Campbell wrote:
> > Gee, didn't you notice that Shiro's comments were actually addressed?
>
> I didn't notice, because it looked to me like they weren't addressed.

Shiro's comments were addressed.  The size issue was fixed two
unofficial drafts ago.  The naming issues with alists were fixed in the
draft I just announced, as well as the alist semantic overloading
problems and the comparions with existing SRFIs and systems.

	Scott