Re: strings draft - Simplelists

Show/hide message thread

strings draft Tom Lord (22 Jan 2004 04:58 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (22 Jan 2004 09:46 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (22 Jan 2004 17:32 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (23 Jan 2004 05:03 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 00:31 UTC)

Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky (24 Jan 2004 03:00 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (24 Jan 2004 03:27 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 04:18 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (24 Jan 2004 04:49 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 18:47 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (24 Jan 2004 22:16 UTC)

Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Shiro Kawai (26 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear (26 Jan 2004 19:04 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Matthew Dempsky (26 Jan 2004 20:12 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Matthew Dempsky (26 Jan 2004 20:40 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Ken Dickey (27 Jan 2004 04:33 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char Shiro Kawai (27 Jan 2004 05:12 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char Tom Lord (27 Jan 2004 05:23 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char bear (27 Jan 2004 08:35 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear (27 Jan 2004 08:33 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Ken Dickey (27 Jan 2004 15:43 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear (27 Jan 2004 19:06 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char Shiro Kawai (26 Jan 2004 23:39 UTC)

Strings, one last detail. bear (30 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. Shiro Kawai (30 Jan 2004 21:43 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. Tom Lord (31 Jan 2004 00:13 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. bear (31 Jan 2004 20:26 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. Tom Lord (31 Jan 2004 20:42 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. bear (01 Feb 2004 02:29 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. Tom Lord (01 Feb 2004 02:44 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. bear (01 Feb 2004 07:53 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (22 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 01:53 UTC)

READ-OCTET (Re: strings draft) Shiro Kawai (23 Jan 2004 06:01 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (23 Jan 2004 07:04 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (23 Jan 2004 07:20 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 00:02 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (26 Jan 2004 01:59 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (26 Jan 2004 02:22 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (26 Jan 2004 02:48 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (26 Jan 2004 03:00 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (26 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (26 Jan 2004 04:58 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (24 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 02:10 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 02:29 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 02:44 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 02:53 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:04 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 03:16 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:42 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (23 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 02:49 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (23 Jan 2004 02:58 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:13 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (23 Jan 2004 03:19 UTC)

Re: strings draft Bradd W. Szonye (23 Jan 2004 19:31 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (26 Jan 2004 02:22 UTC)

Re: strings draft Bradd W. Szonye (06 Feb 2004 23:30 UTC)

Re: strings draft Bradd W. Szonye (06 Feb 2004 23:33 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (09 Feb 2004 01:45 UTC)

specifying source encoding (Re: strings draft) Shiro Kawai (09 Feb 2004 02:51 UTC)

Re: strings draft Bradd W. Szonye (09 Feb 2004 03:39 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:12 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (23 Jan 2004 03:28 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:44 UTC)

Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey (23 Jan 2004 17:02 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] bear (23 Jan 2004 17:56 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Per Bothner (23 Jan 2004 18:56 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 20:26 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Per Bothner (23 Jan 2004 20:57 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 21:44 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 20:07 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 22:38 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx (24 Jan 2004 06:48 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 18:41 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx (24 Jan 2004 19:34 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 21:48 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey (23 Jan 2004 21:47 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 23:22 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey (25 Jan 2004 01:03 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (25 Jan 2004 03:01 UTC)

Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky (25 Jan 2004 06:59 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (25 Jan 2004 07:16 UTC)

Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky (26 Jan 2004 23:52 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (27 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx 23 Jan 2004 02:44 UTC

Tom Lord <xxxxxx@emf.net> writes:

>     > This is inconsistent with best Unicode practice, thanks to the
>     > "Turkish I Problem".
>
> Actually, I _think_ it works out fine.  Please see the corresponding
> threads on comp.lang.scheme.

My understanding is that the c.l.s idea is simply to use the generic
Unicode case mapping functions.

I do not object to a Scheme that chooses to do this.  But your draft
seems to exclude a Scheme that does *best* Unicode practice, which is
not to shove any details under the rug.

If I have misunderstood, can you please point to something more
specific for me to read (or reproduce the relevant arguments here)?

Thomas