Thread Index - May 2006 - srfi-91@srfi.schemers.org

Re: Issues with Unicode Jonathan S. Shapiro (09 May 2006 15:08 UTC)

Re: Issues with Unicode John Cowan (09 May 2006 15:33 UTC)

Re: Issues with Unicode Jonathan S. Shapiro (09 May 2006 16:53 UTC)

Re: Issues with Unicode bear (10 May 2006 01:59 UTC)

Re: Issues with Unicode John Cowan (10 May 2006 04:13 UTC)

Re: Issues with Unicode bear (10 May 2006 17:53 UTC)

Re: Issues with Unicode John Cowan (10 May 2006 19:32 UTC)

Re: Issues with Unicode Shiro Kawai (10 May 2006 02:28 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? bear (21 May 2006 14:31 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Jonathan S. Shapiro (21 May 2006 15:27 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (21 May 2006 15:54 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Jonathan S. Shapiro (21 May 2006 16:36 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Per Bothner (21 May 2006 16:59 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (23 May 2006 18:15 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Jonathan S. Shapiro (23 May 2006 18:36 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Per Bothner (23 May 2006 18:57 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Jonathan S. Shapiro (23 May 2006 19:45 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Per Bothner (23 May 2006 20:11 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Jonathan S. Shapiro (23 May 2006 20:18 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (23 May 2006 20:44 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Per Bothner (23 May 2006 21:05 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Thomas Bushnell BSG (23 May 2006 21:26 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Per Bothner (23 May 2006 21:37 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Thomas Bushnell BSG (23 May 2006 22:07 UTC)

(missing)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 May 2006 15:38 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (24 May 2006 15:50 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Per Bothner (23 May 2006 23:23 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 May 2006 03:33 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Per Bothner (24 May 2006 04:32 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 May 2006 04:46 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Per Bothner (24 May 2006 05:07 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Jorgen Schaefer (24 May 2006 10:49 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (24 May 2006 12:35 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 May 2006 16:26 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (24 May 2006 17:18 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (24 May 2006 18:11 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 May 2006 15:44 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (24 May 2006 16:06 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (24 May 2006 06:33 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (24 May 2006 12:47 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 May 2006 15:50 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (24 May 2006 16:17 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (24 May 2006 04:53 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (23 May 2006 20:11 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Jonathan S. Shapiro (23 May 2006 20:20 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Jonathan S. Shapiro (21 May 2006 15:42 UTC)