Date Index - August 2008 - srfi-99@srfi.schemers.org

To perform a single character wildcard search use the "?" symbol. To perform a multiple character wildcard search use the "*" symbol.

01 Aug 2008 04:27 UTC Initial comments Alan Watson
11 Aug 2008 05:39 UTC Why vectors? Derick Eddington
11 Aug 2008 06:00 UTC Clarify mutability of all define-record-type <field spec> Derick Eddington
11 Aug 2008 06:08 UTC Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields Derick Eddington
11 Aug 2008 06:30 UTC Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type? Derick Eddington
11 Aug 2008 07:07 UTC Consider a different define-record-type syntax Derick Eddington
11 Aug 2008 07:29 UTC Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner
11 Aug 2008 07:38 UTC Re: Why vectors? Elf
11 Aug 2008 09:04 UTC Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner
11 Aug 2008 12:53 UTC Re: Why vectors? Physics
11 Aug 2008 21:50 UTC Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington
11 Aug 2008 21:52 UTC Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington
11 Aug 2008 21:58 UTC Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington
11 Aug 2008 22:26 UTC Re: Why vectors? Elf
11 Aug 2008 22:29 UTC Re: Why vectors? Elf
11 Aug 2008 22:57 UTC Re: Why vectors? Elf
11 Aug 2008 23:09 UTC Re: Initial comments William D Clinger
11 Aug 2008 23:10 UTC Re: Clarify mutability of all define-record-type <field spec> William D Clinger
11 Aug 2008 23:11 UTC Re: Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields William D Clinger
11 Aug 2008 23:11 UTC Re: Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type? William D Clinger
11 Aug 2008 23:13 UTC Re: Consider a different define-record-type syntax William D Clinger
11 Aug 2008 23:32 UTC Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington
12 Aug 2008 00:32 UTC Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington
12 Aug 2008 00:34 UTC Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington
12 Aug 2008 01:56 UTC Re: Consider a different define-record-type syntax Derick Eddington
12 Aug 2008 04:27 UTC Re: Initial comments Alan Watson
12 Aug 2008 06:23 UTC Re: Initial comments William D Clinger
12 Aug 2008 07:21 UTC Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner
12 Aug 2008 07:39 UTC Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable Derick Eddington
12 Aug 2008 12:20 UTC Re: Initial comments Alan Watson
12 Aug 2008 15:09 UTC Re: Initial comments William D Clinger
12 Aug 2008 15:14 UTC Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable William D Clinger
12 Aug 2008 15:33 UTC Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable Physics
12 Aug 2008 19:35 UTC rtd-constructor and immutable fields Arthur Smyles
13 Aug 2008 02:20 UTC Re: Why vectors? Elf
13 Aug 2008 02:24 UTC Re: Why vectors? Elf
13 Aug 2008 03:25 UTC Two suggestions about record identity Alexey Radul
13 Aug 2008 03:45 UTC Re: Two suggestions about record identity Ray Blaak
13 Aug 2008 07:35 UTC Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner
29 Aug 2008 21:52 UTC ANN: Implementation of draft for Gambit Arthur Smyles