Thread Index - August 2008 - srfi-99@srfi.schemers.org

To perform a single character wildcard search use the "?" symbol. To perform a multiple character wildcard search use the "*" symbol.

Initial comments Alan Watson 01 Aug 2008 04:27 UTC
Why vectors? Derick Eddington 11 Aug 2008 05:39 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner 11 Aug 2008 07:29 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington 11 Aug 2008 21:50 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Elf 11 Aug 2008 22:26 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington 11 Aug 2008 23:32 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Elf 13 Aug 2008 02:20 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Elf 11 Aug 2008 07:38 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner 11 Aug 2008 09:04 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington 11 Aug 2008 21:52 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Elf 11 Aug 2008 22:29 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington 12 Aug 2008 00:32 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Physics 11 Aug 2008 12:53 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington 11 Aug 2008 21:58 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Elf 11 Aug 2008 22:57 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington 12 Aug 2008 00:34 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner 12 Aug 2008 07:21 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Elf 13 Aug 2008 02:24 UTC
Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner 13 Aug 2008 07:35 UTC
Clarify mutability of all define-record-type <field spec> Derick Eddington 11 Aug 2008 06:00 UTC
Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields Derick Eddington 11 Aug 2008 06:08 UTC
Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type? Derick Eddington 11 Aug 2008 06:30 UTC
Consider a different define-record-type syntax Derick Eddington 11 Aug 2008 07:07 UTC
Re: Initial comments William D Clinger 11 Aug 2008 23:09 UTC
Re: Initial comments Alan Watson 12 Aug 2008 04:27 UTC
Re: Clarify mutability of all define-record-type <field spec> William D Clinger 11 Aug 2008 23:10 UTC
Re: Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields William D Clinger 11 Aug 2008 23:11 UTC
Re: Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type? William D Clinger 11 Aug 2008 23:11 UTC
Re: Consider a different define-record-type syntax William D Clinger 11 Aug 2008 23:13 UTC
Re: Consider a different define-record-type syntax Derick Eddington 12 Aug 2008 01:56 UTC
Re: Initial comments William D Clinger 12 Aug 2008 06:23 UTC
Re: Initial comments Alan Watson 12 Aug 2008 12:20 UTC
Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable Derick Eddington 12 Aug 2008 07:39 UTC
Re: Initial comments William D Clinger 12 Aug 2008 15:09 UTC
Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable William D Clinger 12 Aug 2008 15:14 UTC
Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable Physics 12 Aug 2008 15:33 UTC
rtd-constructor and immutable fields Arthur Smyles 12 Aug 2008 19:35 UTC
Two suggestions about record identity Alexey Radul 13 Aug 2008 03:25 UTC
Re: Two suggestions about record identity Ray Blaak 13 Aug 2008 03:45 UTC
ANN: Implementation of draft for Gambit Arthur Smyles 29 Aug 2008 21:52 UTC