Thread Index - August 2008 - srfi-99@srfi.schemers.org

Initial comments Alan Watson (01 Aug 2008 05:01 UTC)

Why vectors? Derick Eddington (11 Aug 2008 05:39 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner (11 Aug 2008 07:53 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington (11 Aug 2008 21:50 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Elf (11 Aug 2008 22:26 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington (11 Aug 2008 23:32 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Elf (13 Aug 2008 02:20 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Elf (11 Aug 2008 08:28 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner (11 Aug 2008 09:04 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington (11 Aug 2008 21:52 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Elf (11 Aug 2008 22:29 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington (12 Aug 2008 00:32 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Physics (11 Aug 2008 13:15 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington (11 Aug 2008 21:58 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Elf (11 Aug 2008 22:57 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Derick Eddington (12 Aug 2008 00:34 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner (12 Aug 2008 07:21 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Elf (13 Aug 2008 02:24 UTC)

Re: Why vectors? Per Bothner (13 Aug 2008 07:36 UTC)

Clarify mutability of all define-record-type <field spec> Derick Eddington (11 Aug 2008 06:00 UTC)

Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields Derick Eddington (11 Aug 2008 06:08 UTC)

Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type? Derick Eddington (11 Aug 2008 06:30 UTC)

Consider a different define-record-type syntax Derick Eddington (11 Aug 2008 07:07 UTC)

Re: Initial comments William D Clinger (11 Aug 2008 23:09 UTC)

Re: Initial comments Alan Watson (12 Aug 2008 04:27 UTC)

Re: Clarify mutability of all define-record-type <field spec> William D Clinger (11 Aug 2008 23:10 UTC)

Re: Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields William D Clinger (11 Aug 2008 23:11 UTC)

Re: Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type? William D Clinger (11 Aug 2008 23:11 UTC)

Re: Consider a different define-record-type syntax William D Clinger (11 Aug 2008 23:13 UTC)

Re: Consider a different define-record-type syntax Derick Eddington (12 Aug 2008 01:57 UTC)

Re: Initial comments William D Clinger (12 Aug 2008 06:24 UTC)

Re: Initial comments Alan Watson (12 Aug 2008 12:21 UTC)

Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable Derick Eddington (12 Aug 2008 07:39 UTC)

Re: Initial comments William D Clinger (12 Aug 2008 15:10 UTC)

Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable William D Clinger (12 Aug 2008 15:14 UTC)

Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable Physics (12 Aug 2008 15:33 UTC)

rtd-constructor and immutable fields Arthur Smyles (12 Aug 2008 19:52 UTC)

Two suggestions about record identity Alexey Radul (13 Aug 2008 03:25 UTC)

Re: Two suggestions about record identity Ray Blaak (13 Aug 2008 03:45 UTC)

ANN: Implementation of draft for Gambit Arthur Smyles (29 Aug 2008 21:59 UTC)