peer-to-peer
Amirouche Boubekki
(05 Oct 2019 12:24 UTC)
|
We need a pre-SRFI list
hga@xxxxxx
(05 Oct 2019 12:41 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Oct 2019 19:14 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
hga@xxxxxx
(05 Oct 2019 20:20 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Duy Nguyen
(06 Oct 2019 01:47 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list elf (06 Oct 2019 01:51 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
hga@xxxxxx
(06 Oct 2019 02:18 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
elf
(06 Oct 2019 02:33 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Oct 2019 04:57 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
hga@xxxxxx
(06 Oct 2019 11:42 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Oct 2019 06:09 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Oct 2019 17:30 UTC)
|
Planning how to organize Scheme discussion
Lassi Kortela
(06 Oct 2019 17:48 UTC)
|
Re: Planning how to organize Scheme discussion
hga@xxxxxx
(06 Oct 2019 19:41 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Oct 2019 18:30 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Lassi Kortela
(06 Oct 2019 19:31 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Oct 2019 19:48 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Oct 2019 19:56 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
elf
(06 Oct 2019 01:53 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Vladimir Nikishkin
(06 Oct 2019 03:06 UTC)
|
Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
Duy Nguyen
(06 Oct 2019 04:13 UTC)
|
Matrix libraries
Lassi Kortela
(06 Oct 2019 14:51 UTC)
|
Re: Matrix libraries
John Cowan
(06 Oct 2019 17:55 UTC)
|
Who's working on what?
Lassi Kortela
(06 Oct 2019 19:39 UTC)
|
Re: Who's working on what?
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Oct 2019 20:19 UTC)
|
Re: Who's working on what?
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Oct 2019 20:26 UTC)
|
Re: Who's working on what?
John Cowan
(06 Oct 2019 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: peer-to-peer
Amirouche Boubekki
(05 Oct 2019 14:43 UTC)
|
Re: peer-to-peer
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Oct 2019 05:14 UTC)
|
Peer-to-peer, sockets and binary s-expressions
Lassi Kortela
(06 Oct 2019 12:41 UTC)
|
Re: Peer-to-peer, sockets and binary s-expressions
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Oct 2019 13:46 UTC)
|
Re: Peer-to-peer, sockets and binary s-expressions
John Cowan
(06 Oct 2019 20:35 UTC)
|
Re: Peer-to-peer, sockets and binary s-expressions
Vladimir Nikishkin
(07 Oct 2019 02:42 UTC)
|
WebSockets
Lassi Kortela
(06 Oct 2019 12:47 UTC)
|
Re: WebSockets
Per Bothner
(06 Oct 2019 14:40 UTC)
|
Re: WebSockets
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Oct 2019 19:53 UTC)
|
If i may be so bold as to interject - We already have this. It's called writing the SRFIs that you want to and think have general applicability. There is already a significant amount of new growth. Overloading an existing process with lists of things people want but don't personally want to spend the time working on is a fast way to kill everything. Deal with the large number of existing issues before making a basket to add new ones. -elf On October 6, 2019 4:46:43 AM GMT+03:00, Duy Nguyen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 3:21 AM <xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com> wrote: >> What general things might we want that fall under this but not >Schemeweb? >> >> ... >> >> I'd add: >> >> ... >> >> Radio in general, ham or unlicensed bands. > >Oh, oh! Before we go real radio, something more like Matlab / Octave >first would be great. Of the top of my head: matrix calculation, >plotting, fast fourier transform, cross correlation, convolution... >This is very useful for experiment with radio signal processing. > >Except plotting, all of this could be done in pure scheme. Having >standard names is good though, so that a C-based implementation can be >added to have better performance. And if we really do radio in scheme, >high performance is a requirement, not an option.