Le dim. 6 oct. 2019 à 04:18, <xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com> a écrit :
>
> > From: elf <xxxxxx@ephemeral.net>
> > Date: Saturday, October 05, 2019 8:51 PM

> It's rather wasteful if you go down a wrong path while writing one, and potentially slower.  It depends a lot on how people prefer to work; I prefer to have some people to bounce ideas off of.  John Cowan for example precisely defined 1/2 of criteria for databases my inchoate sdbi will be supporting, they must return rectangular results.
>
> > There is already a significant amount of new growth.
>
> My point is that as Arthur previously stated, it shouldn't be happening on srfi-discuss.
>

a) Sorry, I did not know pre-SRFI should not be sent to srfi-discuss.

b) I already tried to reach schemers around, but without success. Next
I will try the newsgroup.

c) "The old know, the young can". There should be a space where we can
bounce idea around.

+1 for pre-SRFI topic list.