Re: We need a pre-SRFI list
elf 06 Oct 2019 01:51 UTC
If i may be so bold as to interject -
We already have this.
It's called writing the SRFIs that you want to and think have general applicability.
There is already a significant amount of new growth. Overloading an existing process with lists of things people want but don't personally want to spend the time working on is a fast way to kill everything.
Deal with the large number of existing issues before making a basket to add new ones.
-elf
On October 6, 2019 4:46:43 AM GMT+03:00, Duy Nguyen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 3:21 AM <xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com> wrote:
>> What general things might we want that fall under this but not
>Schemeweb?
>>
>> ...
>>
>> I'd add:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Radio in general, ham or unlicensed bands.
>
>Oh, oh! Before we go real radio, something more like Matlab / Octave
>first would be great. Of the top of my head: matrix calculation,
>plotting, fast fourier transform, cross correlation, convolution...
>This is very useful for experiment with radio signal processing.
>
>Except plotting, all of this could be done in pure scheme. Having
>standard names is good though, so that a C-based implementation can be
>added to have better performance. And if we really do radio in scheme,
>high performance is a requirement, not an option.