Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(07 Jun 2021 15:45 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(07 Jun 2021 16:07 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(09 Jun 2021 08:50 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 09:13 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(09 Jun 2021 09:42 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Feeley
(09 Jun 2021 10:24 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 10:32 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Feeley
(09 Jun 2021 12:16 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 12:41 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Feeley
(09 Jun 2021 13:10 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 15:56 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Feeley
(09 Jun 2021 18:15 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 10:27 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(14 Oct 2021 10:42 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(09 Jun 2021 17:22 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 17:38 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Peter Bex
(08 Jun 2021 05:18 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Per Bothner
(08 Jun 2021 05:38 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(09 Jun 2021 09:01 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Per Bothner
(10 Jun 2021 17:23 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(21 Jun 2021 07:23 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters Daphne Preston-Kendal (09 Jun 2021 08:55 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(09 Jun 2021 14:30 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 14:44 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(09 Jun 2021 17:03 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 17:33 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(09 Jun 2021 17:37 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 17:40 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(09 Jun 2021 19:01 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2021 19:26 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(10 Jun 2021 10:17 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(10 Jun 2021 11:19 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(12 Jun 2021 22:09 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(21 Jun 2021 07:22 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(21 Jun 2021 10:37 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(29 Jul 2021 09:42 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(29 Jul 2021 23:34 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(30 Jul 2021 07:03 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jul 2021 07:31 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(30 Jul 2021 21:40 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jul 2021 21:48 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(30 Jul 2021 21:50 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jul 2021 21:59 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(30 Jul 2021 21:32 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(31 Jul 2021 10:02 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2021 10:29 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2021 17:33 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(31 Jul 2021 17:46 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2021 18:04 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2021 19:52 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(02 Dec 2021 17:57 UTC)
|
Re: Reviewing named and optional parameters
Jeronimo Pellegrini
(03 Dec 2021 03:32 UTC)
|
On 8 Jun 2021, at 07:17, Peter Bex <xxxxxx@more-magic.net> wrote: > One nitpick: at the end you mention: > "in Chicken [keywords] are symbols, but in DSSSL and other > implementations they are a disjoint type" I’m referring there to the magic constants #!key, #!rest, and #!optional, not to keyword datums themselves. I have 5.2.0 here: #;1> #!key Error: unbound variable: #!key #;1> '#!key #!key #;2> (symbol? '#!key) #t #;3> '#!zoo Error: invalid `#!' token: "zoo" #;3> (define #!key 'zoo) #;4> #!key zoo > This used to be true, but since 5.1.0 (released in July 2019) we've > successfully managed to turn them into a disjoint type. The conflation > of symbols and keywords was made possible due to a godawful hack that > interfered with read/write invariance which we've now thankfully dropped > completely by making them disjoint. This surfaced several bugs in macros > and also pointed out that people were using forms like (define foo: ...) > which would result in a keyword being bound, so that it would no longer > self-evaluate. This is useful to know, thank you. I think Chicken's experiences here could be more generally instructive. > Also, you state that in Gauche, keywords respond #t to symbol?, but > I do not see this in 0.9.6 on Debian. However, if I invoke "gosh" > with an unrecognised switch like "-h", I see GAUCHE_KEYWORD_IS_SYMBOL > and GAUCHE_KEYWORD_DISJOINT in the list of environment variables. > It looks like this influences the behaviour of keywords, and it also > mentions that the former environment variable is to make it "fully R7RS > conformant". Maybe worth a second look. I have 0.9.10 (installed from Homebrew on Mac) and this seems to be the default behaviour: gosh> :key :key gosh> (symbol? :key) #t However, it's also good to know that this is apparently customizable! Thank you for the helpful reply! > Cheers, > Peter Daphne