Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela 23 Apr 2020 07:02 UTC
> Could we simply add some prose to SRFI 170 permitting > implementations to > translate relative pathnames per the thread CWD before passing them to > the syscalls? > > It seems to me that would break portability, but I can't quite put my > finger on why. The kernel translates relative pathnames to absolute ones anyway. It shouldn't be a problem if we translate one step earlier, on the Scheme side.