current-umask | Simplelists

Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O hga@xxxxxx (22 Apr 2020 17:13 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O John Cowan (22 Apr 2020 20:42 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (22 Apr 2020 20:53 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O John Cowan (22 Apr 2020 21:29 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (22 Apr 2020 21:36 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (22 Apr 2020 21:43 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 03:38 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 07:02 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 07:05 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Göran Weinholt (23 Apr 2020 10:54 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:09 UTC)

Per-thread umask Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:30 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:44 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:47 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:59 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 15:03 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 15:20 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 16:02 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 16:03 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:14 UTC)

current directory and openat() et al Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:27 UTC)

Re: current directory and openat() et al Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 13:56 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:33 UTC)

Normalizing the current directory Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:39 UTC)

Re: Normalizing the current directory Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:55 UTC)

Re: Normalizing the current directory Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 12:10 UTC)

Using paths that are searchable but not completely readable hga@xxxxxx (23 Apr 2020 12:30 UTC)

Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 14:13 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 14:16 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Sebastien Marie (23 Apr 2020 13:32 UTC)

Definition of working directory Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 13:51 UTC)

Re: Definition of working directory Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 14:07 UTC)

Re: Definition of working directory Sebastien Marie (23 Apr 2020 15:31 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 15:24 UTC)

Separate high-level and low-level APIs Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 15:38 UTC)

Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 15:44 UTC)

Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 15:48 UTC)

Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs hga@xxxxxx (23 Apr 2020 16:19 UTC)

Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 16:42 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O hga@xxxxxx (23 Apr 2020 15:41 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O hga@xxxxxx (22 Apr 2020 23:58 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 16:07 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 16:14 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 16:25 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 17:26 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 17:55 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 18:55 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 20:12 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (23 Apr 2020 22:17 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Lassi Kortela (24 Apr 2020 08:43 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (24 Apr 2020 11:27 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Lassi Kortela (24 Apr 2020 11:37 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (24 Apr 2020 12:22 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (24 Apr 2020 12:28 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (26 Apr 2020 09:19 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (27 Apr 2020 22:46 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (27 Apr 2020 23:42 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (28 Apr 2020 00:42 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (28 Apr 2020 00:56 UTC)

os-working-directory Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 09:23 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory Duy Nguyen (29 Apr 2020 09:28 UTC)

current-umask Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 09:43 UTC)

Windows Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 09:47 UTC)

Re: Windows Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 09:49 UTC)

Re: Windows John Cowan (29 Apr 2020 14:53 UTC)

Re: current-umask hga@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2020 13:14 UTC)

Re: current-umask Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 13:25 UTC)

Re: current-umask Marc Feeley (29 Apr 2020 13:31 UTC)

Re: current-umask Marc Feeley (29 Apr 2020 13:45 UTC)

Re: current-umask Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 14:12 UTC)

Re: current-umask hga@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2020 16:21 UTC)

Re: current-umask Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 16:44 UTC)

Re: current-umask John Cowan (30 Apr 2020 04:02 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory John Cowan (30 Apr 2020 02:49 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory Lassi Kortela (30 Apr 2020 06:12 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory Sebastien Marie (30 Apr 2020 07:19 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory Sebastien Marie (30 Apr 2020 07:53 UTC)

Should the SRFI mandate current-directory per thread? Lassi Kortela (30 Apr 2020 12:14 UTC)

Re: Should the SRFI mandate current-directory per thread? Sebastien Marie (30 Apr 2020 17:00 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal hga@xxxxxx (28 Apr 2020 01:03 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (28 Apr 2020 01:42 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Apr 2020 07:11 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (30 Apr 2020 11:33 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 18:38 UTC)

current-umask Lassi Kortela 29 Apr 2020 09:43 UTC

> current-directory is also used by Gauche, with a comment that says
> "... is found in ChezScheme, MzScheme, etc."

Great! That should settle it. So e.g.:

* current-directory (per-thread parameter)
* os-current-directory (procedure - 0 args = getter, 1 arg = setter)

* current-umask (per-thread parameter)
* os-[current-]umask (procedure - 0 args = getter, 1 arg = setter)

IMHO "umask" is a bit cryptic and not applicable outside Unix. Could it
be "unix-mask" instead, or simply "file-mask", "file-mode-mask",
"file-permission-mask" or something? What's the equivalent on Windows?