Thread Index - December 2003 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org

thread-safe interfaces Jim Blandy (22 Dec 2003 07:40 UTC)
Re: thread-safe interfaces Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC)
Re: thread-safe interfaces [correction] Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 22:27 UTC)
character strings versus byte strings Matthew Flatt (22 Dec 2003 14:16 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Per Bothner (22 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Matthew Flatt (22 Dec 2003 17:23 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (22 Dec 2003 20:23 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 22:06 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (22 Dec 2003 22:21 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 22:36 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (22 Dec 2003 22:41 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Shiro Kawai (22 Dec 2003 23:00 UTC)
passing C data to Scheme world Shiro Kawai (22 Dec 2003 23:45 UTC)
Re: passing C data to Scheme world Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 17:33 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 01:29 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 03:30 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 04:45 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 09:48 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 17:42 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Bradd W. Szonye (23 Dec 2003 17:46 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 01:09 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 01:47 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 03:29 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 09:36 UTC)
Couple things... felix (22 Dec 2003 17:51 UTC)
Strings/chars Shiro Kawai (22 Dec 2003 21:51 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 22:14 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 09:30 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Alex Shinn (24 Dec 2003 02:51 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 04:47 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 10:56 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai (23 Dec 2003 21:33 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars bear (24 Dec 2003 00:04 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 09:22 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 09:57 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 10:12 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Per Bothner (24 Dec 2003 01:34 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (24 Dec 2003 11:43 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (24 Dec 2003 23:30 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 18:46 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (27 Dec 2003 19:35 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (27 Dec 2003 19:56 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (27 Dec 2003 20:36 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (27 Dec 2003 21:15 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (28 Dec 2003 06:54 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (30 Dec 2003 21:57 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (24 Dec 2003 12:40 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:16 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (27 Dec 2003 20:16 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (28 Dec 2003 09:25 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (30 Dec 2003 21:41 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy (23 Dec 2003 18:38 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (24 Dec 2003 12:01 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 16:29 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (27 Dec 2003 20:20 UTC)
GC safety and return values Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 20:58 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy (22 Dec 2003 21:26 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 21:47 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values tb@xxxxxx (22 Dec 2003 22:27 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:18 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 17:56 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:08 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy (22 Dec 2003 22:28 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 22:42 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 08:41 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 17:10 UTC)
Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? bear (24 Dec 2003 18:08 UTC)
Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 19:01 UTC)
Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? bear (24 Dec 2003 20:21 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values tb@xxxxxx (24 Dec 2003 20:29 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 20:42 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:24 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 17:50 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:10 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 16:47 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 17:42 UTC)
more on GC issues Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:03 UTC)
handling multiple scheme instances Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:05 UTC)
Re: handling multiple scheme instances Shiro Kawai (23 Dec 2003 23:24 UTC)
Re: handling multiple scheme instances tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 23:29 UTC)
Re: handling multiple scheme instances Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:12 UTC)
Re: handling multiple scheme instances Tom Lord (27 Dec 2003 18:48 UTC)
no constants please Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:06 UTC)
Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 23:10 UTC)
Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 18:31 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:24 UTC)
Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:17 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (27 Dec 2003 18:55 UTC)
Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (28 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC)
Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (28 Dec 2003 09:45 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (28 Dec 2003 17:01 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 14:52 UTC)
Re: no constants please bear (31 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 18:26 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 18:42 UTC)
Re: no constants please bear (31 Dec 2003 20:01 UTC)
Re: no constants please Ken Dickey (31 Dec 2003 17:18 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 19:12 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 19:33 UTC)
Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (31 Dec 2003 19:50 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 21:13 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 21:34 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 22:00 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 22:17 UTC)
Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (31 Dec 2003 23:39 UTC)
non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:07 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:41 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 18:14 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 18:30 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:19 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:16 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (27 Dec 2003 18:38 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 18:43 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (28 Dec 2003 02:11 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (28 Dec 2003 09:32 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (28 Dec 2003 17:36 UTC)
maybe pika Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:09 UTC)
Re: maybe pika Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:42 UTC)
Re: maybe pika Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 18:59 UTC)
Re: maybe pika Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:51 UTC)
target applications Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 17:47 UTC)
Re: target applications tb@xxxxxx (24 Dec 2003 20:35 UTC)
Re: target applications Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:47 UTC)
Re: target applications Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 23:56 UTC)
Re: target applications Tom Lord (25 Dec 2003 00:35 UTC)
general cr88192 (25 Dec 2003 10:18 UTC)
flow of control issues Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 18:53 UTC)
Re: flow of control issues Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:21 UTC)
Re: flow of control issues Tom Lord (27 Dec 2003 19:08 UTC)
numeric ranges and errors Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:04 UTC)
misc cr88192 (29 Dec 2003 10:19 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 18:38 UTC)