Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O

Show/hide message thread

Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O hga@xxxxxx (22 Apr 2020 17:13 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O John Cowan (22 Apr 2020 20:42 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (22 Apr 2020 20:53 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O John Cowan (22 Apr 2020 21:29 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O hga@xxxxxx (22 Apr 2020 23:58 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (22 Apr 2020 21:36 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (22 Apr 2020 21:43 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 03:38 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 07:02 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 07:05 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Göran Weinholt (23 Apr 2020 10:54 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:09 UTC)

Per-thread umask Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:30 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:44 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:47 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:59 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 15:03 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 15:20 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 16:02 UTC)

Re: Per-thread umask John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 16:03 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:14 UTC)

current directory and openat() et al Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:27 UTC)

Re: current directory and openat() et al Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 13:56 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:33 UTC)

Normalizing the current directory Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 11:39 UTC)

Re: Normalizing the current directory Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 11:55 UTC)

Re: Normalizing the current directory Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 12:10 UTC)

Using paths that are searchable but not completely readable hga@xxxxxx (23 Apr 2020 12:30 UTC)

Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 14:13 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Sebastien Marie (23 Apr 2020 13:32 UTC)

Definition of working directory Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 13:51 UTC)

Re: Definition of working directory Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 14:07 UTC)

Re: Definition of working directory Sebastien Marie (23 Apr 2020 15:31 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 15:24 UTC)

Separate high-level and low-level APIs Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 15:38 UTC)

Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 15:44 UTC)

Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 15:48 UTC)

Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs hga@xxxxxx (23 Apr 2020 16:19 UTC)

Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 16:42 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O hga@xxxxxx (23 Apr 2020 15:41 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 14:16 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 16:07 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 16:14 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 16:25 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 17:26 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (23 Apr 2020 17:55 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Apr 2020 18:55 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 20:12 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (23 Apr 2020 22:17 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Lassi Kortela (24 Apr 2020 08:43 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (24 Apr 2020 11:27 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Lassi Kortela (24 Apr 2020 11:37 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (24 Apr 2020 12:22 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (23 Apr 2020 18:38 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (24 Apr 2020 12:28 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (26 Apr 2020 09:19 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (27 Apr 2020 22:46 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (27 Apr 2020 23:42 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal John Cowan (28 Apr 2020 00:42 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Shiro Kawai (28 Apr 2020 00:56 UTC)

os-working-directory Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 09:23 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory Duy Nguyen (29 Apr 2020 09:28 UTC)

current-umask Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 09:43 UTC)

Windows Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 09:47 UTC)

Re: Windows Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 09:49 UTC)

Re: Windows John Cowan (29 Apr 2020 14:53 UTC)

Re: current-umask hga@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2020 13:14 UTC)

Re: current-umask Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 13:25 UTC)

Re: current-umask Marc Feeley (29 Apr 2020 13:31 UTC)

Re: current-umask Marc Feeley (29 Apr 2020 13:45 UTC)

Re: current-umask Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 14:12 UTC)

Re: current-umask hga@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2020 16:21 UTC)

Re: current-umask Lassi Kortela (29 Apr 2020 16:44 UTC)

Re: current-umask John Cowan (30 Apr 2020 04:02 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory John Cowan (30 Apr 2020 02:49 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory Lassi Kortela (30 Apr 2020 06:12 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory Sebastien Marie (30 Apr 2020 07:19 UTC)

Re: os-working-directory Sebastien Marie (30 Apr 2020 07:53 UTC)

Should the SRFI mandate current-directory per thread? Lassi Kortela (30 Apr 2020 12:14 UTC)

Re: Should the SRFI mandate current-directory per thread? Sebastien Marie (30 Apr 2020 17:00 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal hga@xxxxxx (28 Apr 2020 01:03 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (28 Apr 2020 01:42 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Apr 2020 07:11 UTC)

Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal Marc Feeley (30 Apr 2020 11:33 UTC)

Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O Lassi Kortela 22 Apr 2020 21:36 UTC

> I think what happens then is that SRFI-170 procedures work with the
> per-process $CWD and the R7RS procedures work with the per-thread $CWD.
> I agree that this is confusing, but I don't know what to do about it all.

That's my interpretation as well.

Could we simply add some prose to SRFI 170 permitting implementations to
translate relative pathnames per the thread CWD before passing them to
the syscalls? While at it, we could also allow translating pathname
objects to strings (for Schemes like Kawa that have a path datatype).