|
Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
hga@xxxxxx
(22 Apr 2020 17:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
John Cowan
(22 Apr 2020 20:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Lassi Kortela
(22 Apr 2020 20:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
John Cowan
(22 Apr 2020 21:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Lassi Kortela
(22 Apr 2020 21:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Lassi Kortela
(22 Apr 2020 21:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
John Cowan
(23 Apr 2020 03:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 07:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 07:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Göran Weinholt
(23 Apr 2020 10:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 11:09 UTC)
|
|
Per-thread umask
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 11:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread umask
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 11:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread umask
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 11:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread umask
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 11:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread umask
John Cowan
(23 Apr 2020 15:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread umask
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 15:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread umask
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 16:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread umask
John Cowan
(23 Apr 2020 16:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 11:14 UTC)
|
|
current directory and openat() et al
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 11:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: current directory and openat() et al
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 13:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Sebastien Marie
(23 Apr 2020 13:32 UTC)
|
|
Definition of working directory
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 13:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: Definition of working directory
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 14:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Definition of working directory
Sebastien Marie
(23 Apr 2020 15:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(23 Apr 2020 15:24 UTC)
|
|
Separate high-level and low-level APIs
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 15:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(23 Apr 2020 15:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs Lassi Kortela (23 Apr 2020 15:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs
hga@xxxxxx
(23 Apr 2020 16:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Separate high-level and low-level APIs
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 16:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
hga@xxxxxx
(23 Apr 2020 15:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
hga@xxxxxx
(22 Apr 2020 23:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of SRFI 170 through 3.2 I/O
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 11:33 UTC)
|
|
Normalizing the current directory
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 11:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Normalizing the current directory
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 11:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Normalizing the current directory
Lassi Kortela
(23 Apr 2020 12:10 UTC)
|
|
Using paths that are searchable but not completely readable
hga@xxxxxx
(23 Apr 2020 12:30 UTC)
|
|
Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
John Cowan
(23 Apr 2020 14:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 14:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
John Cowan
(23 Apr 2020 16:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(23 Apr 2020 16:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 16:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(23 Apr 2020 17:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Feeley
(23 Apr 2020 17:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(23 Apr 2020 18:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
John Cowan
(23 Apr 2020 20:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Shiro Kawai
(23 Apr 2020 22:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Lassi Kortela
(24 Apr 2020 08:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Shiro Kawai
(24 Apr 2020 11:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Lassi Kortela
(24 Apr 2020 11:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Shiro Kawai
(24 Apr 2020 12:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Feeley
(24 Apr 2020 12:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(26 Apr 2020 09:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
John Cowan
(27 Apr 2020 22:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Shiro Kawai
(27 Apr 2020 23:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
John Cowan
(28 Apr 2020 00:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Shiro Kawai
(28 Apr 2020 00:56 UTC)
|
|
os-working-directory
Lassi Kortela
(29 Apr 2020 09:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: os-working-directory
Duy Nguyen
(29 Apr 2020 09:28 UTC)
|
|
current-umask
Lassi Kortela
(29 Apr 2020 09:43 UTC)
|
|
Windows
Lassi Kortela
(29 Apr 2020 09:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Windows
Lassi Kortela
(29 Apr 2020 09:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: Windows
John Cowan
(29 Apr 2020 14:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: current-umask
hga@xxxxxx
(29 Apr 2020 13:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: current-umask
Lassi Kortela
(29 Apr 2020 13:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: current-umask
Marc Feeley
(29 Apr 2020 13:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: current-umask
Marc Feeley
(29 Apr 2020 13:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: current-umask
Lassi Kortela
(29 Apr 2020 14:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: current-umask
hga@xxxxxx
(29 Apr 2020 16:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: current-umask
Lassi Kortela
(29 Apr 2020 16:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: current-umask
John Cowan
(30 Apr 2020 04:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: os-working-directory
John Cowan
(30 Apr 2020 02:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: os-working-directory
Lassi Kortela
(30 Apr 2020 06:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: os-working-directory
Sebastien Marie
(30 Apr 2020 07:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: os-working-directory
Sebastien Marie
(30 Apr 2020 07:53 UTC)
|
|
Should the SRFI mandate current-directory per thread?
Lassi Kortela
(30 Apr 2020 12:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: Should the SRFI mandate current-directory per thread?
Sebastien Marie
(30 Apr 2020 17:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
hga@xxxxxx
(28 Apr 2020 01:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Feeley
(28 Apr 2020 01:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Apr 2020 07:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
Marc Feeley
(30 Apr 2020 11:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: Per-thread working directory and umask proposal
John Cowan
(23 Apr 2020 18:38 UTC)
|
>> The low level is: [...] >> >> High level: [...] >> >> So they sound almost the same. > > And if so? This gives freedom to the Scheme world because one does not > have to stick to POSIX semantics when there are better semantics and > it allows access to the underlying POSIX features. If one goes through > the POSIX API, are umasks and pathnames really the only things that > one would handle differently on the Scheme side? My point is that if they are so similar, they could be just one API that is less strictly tied to POSIX. There could perhaps be simple escape hatches for people who want bare POSIX semantics (such as binding the current-directory parameter to #f to disable pathname translation). The current SRFI 170 is already designed with a view to being implemented on Windows (and not only Cygwin/Msys). For the people who want strict Unix APIs and nothing else... that's what FFIs are for :)
