Group Email Manager

login signup

Date Index - December 2003 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org

22 Dec 2003 07:37 UTC thread-safe interfaces Jim Blandy
22 Dec 2003 14:16 UTC character strings versus byte strings Matthew Flatt
22 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Per Bothner
22 Dec 2003 17:23 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Matthew Flatt
22 Dec 2003 17:54 UTC Couple things... felix
22 Dec 2003 20:23 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 21:22 UTC GC safety and return values Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 21:22 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy
22 Dec 2003 21:51 UTC Strings/chars Shiro Kawai
22 Dec 2003 22:10 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 22:21 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 22:24 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy
22 Dec 2003 22:27 UTC Re: GC safety and return values tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 22:30 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 22:37 UTC Re: Strings/chars Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 22:41 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 22:59 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 23:00 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Shiro Kawai
22 Dec 2003 23:45 UTC passing C data to Scheme world Shiro Kawai
23 Dec 2003 01:09 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 01:29 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 01:47 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 03:29 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 03:30 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 04:45 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 09:22 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:30 UTC Re: Strings/chars Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC Re: thread-safe interfaces Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:36 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:48 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 09:57 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 10:12 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 10:56 UTC Re: Strings/chars Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 17:42 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 17:46 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Bradd W. Szonye
23 Dec 2003 18:34 UTC Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy
23 Dec 2003 21:33 UTC Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai
23 Dec 2003 23:04 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:10 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 23:24 UTC Re: handling multiple scheme instances Shiro Kawai
23 Dec 2003 23:27 UTC more on GC issues Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:29 UTC handling multiple scheme instances Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:29 UTC Re: handling multiple scheme instances tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 23:30 UTC no constants please Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:31 UTC non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:33 UTC maybe pika Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 00:03 UTC Re: Strings/chars bear
24 Dec 2003 01:34 UTC Re: Couple things... Per Bothner
24 Dec 2003 02:48 UTC Re: Strings/chars Alex Shinn
24 Dec 2003 05:11 UTC Re: Strings/chars Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 08:37 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 11:46 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
24 Dec 2003 12:03 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
24 Dec 2003 12:42 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
24 Dec 2003 16:25 UTC Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 16:43 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 17:34 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 18:06 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 18:08 UTC Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? bear
24 Dec 2003 18:10 UTC target applications Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 19:24 UTC Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 20:21 UTC Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? bear
24 Dec 2003 20:29 UTC Re: GC safety and return values tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 20:34 UTC Re: target applications tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 21:05 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 22:23 UTC Re: thread-safe interfaces [correction] Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 23:30 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 23:51 UTC Re: target applications Jim Blandy
25 Dec 2003 00:59 UTC Re: target applications Tom Lord
25 Dec 2003 10:19 UTC general cr88192
26 Dec 2003 15:15 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:18 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:24 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:41 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:42 UTC Re: maybe pika Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:47 UTC Re: target applications Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 18:14 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 18:20 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 18:30 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 18:31 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 18:38 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:17 UTC flow of control issues Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:24 UTC Re: maybe pika Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:29 UTC numeric ranges and errors Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:43 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:48 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 20:16 UTC Re: maybe pika Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 16:08 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:10 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:12 UTC Re: handling multiple scheme instances Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:16 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:17 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:21 UTC Re: flow of control issues Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 17:33 UTC Re: passing C data to Scheme world Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 18:43 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 18:46 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 19:03 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:13 UTC Re: handling multiple scheme instances Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:19 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:33 UTC Re: flow of control issues Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:34 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
27 Dec 2003 19:58 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
27 Dec 2003 20:19 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
27 Dec 2003 20:23 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
27 Dec 2003 20:35 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
27 Dec 2003 21:18 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
28 Dec 2003 02:36 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
28 Dec 2003 06:54 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
28 Dec 2003 09:25 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
28 Dec 2003 09:32 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
28 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
28 Dec 2003 09:45 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
28 Dec 2003 17:25 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
28 Dec 2003 18:00 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
29 Dec 2003 10:19 UTC misc cr88192
30 Dec 2003 21:44 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
30 Dec 2003 21:59 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
31 Dec 2003 08:22 UTC Re: no constants please Ken Dickey
31 Dec 2003 14:51 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC Re: no constants please bear
31 Dec 2003 18:24 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 19:03 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 19:07 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 19:11 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 19:49 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
31 Dec 2003 19:58 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 20:01 UTC Re: no constants please bear
31 Dec 2003 21:12 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 21:58 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 21:59 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 22:42 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 23:39 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx