login signup

Date Index - December 2003 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org

22 Dec 2003 07:40 UTC thread-safe interfaces Jim Blandy
22 Dec 2003 14:16 UTC character strings versus byte strings Matthew Flatt
22 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Per Bothner
22 Dec 2003 17:23 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Matthew Flatt
22 Dec 2003 17:51 UTC Couple things... felix
22 Dec 2003 20:23 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 20:58 UTC GC safety and return values Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 21:26 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy
22 Dec 2003 21:47 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 21:51 UTC Strings/chars Shiro Kawai
22 Dec 2003 22:06 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 22:14 UTC Re: Strings/chars Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 22:21 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 22:27 UTC Re: GC safety and return values tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 22:28 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy
22 Dec 2003 22:36 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 22:41 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 23:00 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Shiro Kawai
22 Dec 2003 23:45 UTC passing C data to Scheme world Shiro Kawai
23 Dec 2003 01:09 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 01:29 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 01:47 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 03:29 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 03:30 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 04:45 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 09:22 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:30 UTC Re: Strings/chars Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC Re: thread-safe interfaces Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:36 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:48 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 09:57 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 10:12 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 10:56 UTC Re: Strings/chars Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 17:42 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings bear
23 Dec 2003 17:46 UTC Re: character strings versus byte strings Bradd W. Szonye
23 Dec 2003 18:38 UTC Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy
23 Dec 2003 21:33 UTC Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai
23 Dec 2003 22:42 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:03 UTC more on GC issues Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:05 UTC handling multiple scheme instances Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:06 UTC no constants please Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:07 UTC non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:09 UTC maybe pika Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:10 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 23:24 UTC Re: handling multiple scheme instances Shiro Kawai
23 Dec 2003 23:29 UTC Re: handling multiple scheme instances tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 00:04 UTC Re: Strings/chars bear
24 Dec 2003 01:34 UTC Re: Couple things... Per Bothner
24 Dec 2003 02:51 UTC Re: Strings/chars Alex Shinn
24 Dec 2003 04:47 UTC Re: Strings/chars Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 08:41 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 11:43 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
24 Dec 2003 12:01 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
24 Dec 2003 12:40 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
24 Dec 2003 16:29 UTC Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 16:47 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 17:10 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 17:42 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 17:47 UTC target applications Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 18:08 UTC Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? bear
24 Dec 2003 19:01 UTC Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 20:21 UTC Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? bear
24 Dec 2003 20:29 UTC Re: GC safety and return values tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 20:35 UTC Re: target applications tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 20:42 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 22:27 UTC Re: thread-safe interfaces [correction] Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 23:30 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 23:56 UTC Re: target applications Jim Blandy
25 Dec 2003 00:35 UTC Re: target applications Tom Lord
25 Dec 2003 10:18 UTC general cr88192
26 Dec 2003 15:16 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:18 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:24 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:41 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:42 UTC Re: maybe pika Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:47 UTC Re: target applications Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 17:50 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 17:56 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 18:14 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 18:30 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 18:31 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 18:53 UTC flow of control issues Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 18:59 UTC Re: maybe pika Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:04 UTC numeric ranges and errors Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:19 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:24 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:51 UTC Re: maybe pika Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 16:08 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:10 UTC Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:12 UTC Re: handling multiple scheme instances Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:16 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:17 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:21 UTC Re: flow of control issues Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 17:33 UTC Re: passing C data to Scheme world Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 18:38 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 18:43 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 18:46 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 18:48 UTC Re: handling multiple scheme instances Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 18:55 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:08 UTC Re: flow of control issues Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:35 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
27 Dec 2003 19:56 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
27 Dec 2003 20:16 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
27 Dec 2003 20:20 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
27 Dec 2003 20:36 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
27 Dec 2003 21:15 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
28 Dec 2003 02:11 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
28 Dec 2003 06:54 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
28 Dec 2003 09:25 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
28 Dec 2003 09:32 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
28 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
28 Dec 2003 09:45 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
28 Dec 2003 17:01 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
28 Dec 2003 17:36 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
29 Dec 2003 10:19 UTC misc cr88192
30 Dec 2003 21:41 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
30 Dec 2003 21:57 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
31 Dec 2003 14:52 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC Re: no constants please bear
31 Dec 2003 17:18 UTC Re: no constants please Ken Dickey
31 Dec 2003 18:26 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 18:38 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 18:42 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 19:12 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 19:33 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 19:50 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
31 Dec 2003 20:01 UTC Re: no constants please bear
31 Dec 2003 21:13 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 21:34 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 22:00 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 22:17 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 23:39 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx