Date Index - January 2004 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org

01 Jan 2004 15:04 UTC	null-terminated strings vs. strings with length	Sebastian Egner
03 Jan 2004 16:12 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2004 16:16 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2004 19:42 UTC	Re: Couple things...	bear
03 Jan 2004 19:54 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
04 Jan 2004 01:16 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 01:19 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 18:09 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
04 Jan 2004 18:45 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
04 Jan 2004 18:53 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
04 Jan 2004 19:28 UTC	Re: no constants please	felix
04 Jan 2004 20:06 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
04 Jan 2004 21:39 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 22:09 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 22:39 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 22:58 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 01:16 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:21 UTC	I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:31 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:38 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:45 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 11:40 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:06 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:27 UTC	Re: null-terminated strings vs. strings with length	Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:45 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Shiro Kawai
05 Jan 2004 16:51 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 17:00 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 17:48 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 17:53 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	bear
05 Jan 2004 18:05 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 18:16 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	bear
05 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC	Re: no constants please	Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 19:03 UTC	Re: no constants please	Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 19:17 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 19:19 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 22:14 UTC	Pika-style from first principles	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 22:19 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 22:26 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 01:37 UTC	Re: no constants please	tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 01:39 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 02:14 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
06 Jan 2004 02:31 UTC	Re: no constants please	tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 02:55 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 03:09 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
06 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC	Re: no constants please	tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 04:32 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 06:59 UTC	Performance	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:15 UTC	Portability	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC	Re: Portability	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC	Restrictions	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:35 UTC	Re: Restrictions	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 07:39 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 07:42 UTC	Re: no constants please	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 07:48 UTC	Re: Restrictions	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:55 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 08:02 UTC	Reliability	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 09:22 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 09:24 UTC	Re: Restrictions	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 09:51 UTC	Re: Restrictions	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 09:56 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 10:24 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 10:37 UTC	Re: Restrictions	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 10:46 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 10:56 UTC	A note on process	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 10:57 UTC	Re: Restrictions	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 11:25 UTC	Re: A note on process	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 11:41 UTC	Re: A note on process	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 12:36 UTC	Re: A note on process	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 13:10 UTC	Re: A note on process	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 13:18 UTC	Re: A note on process	Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 15:36 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Marc Feeley
06 Jan 2004 16:25 UTC	scheme_lookup_imported_binding	David Van Horn
06 Jan 2004 16:40 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 17:25 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 18:07 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 18:51 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	bear
06 Jan 2004 19:52 UTC	Re: no constants please	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 20:00 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 20:36 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 21:58 UTC	Re: A note on process	Tom Lord
07 Jan 2004 00:54 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
07 Jan 2004 05:47 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Marc Feeley
07 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Michael Sperber
07 Jan 2004 22:01 UTC	when GC is permitted	Jim Blandy
07 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC	Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"	Jim Blandy
07 Jan 2004 22:33 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Richard Kelsey
07 Jan 2004 23:14 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 01:35 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 01:43 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 04:21 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 07:33 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Felix Winkelmann
08 Jan 2004 08:09 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 08:25 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 08:34 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 08:58 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Felix Winkelmann
08 Jan 2004 09:45 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Shiro Kawai
08 Jan 2004 16:56 UTC	Re: Couple things...	bear
08 Jan 2004 17:32 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 19:37 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 19:46 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 19:47 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 19:51 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 20:01 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Richard Kelsey
08 Jan 2004 20:36 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 21:01 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Marc Feeley
08 Jan 2004 21:58 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 21:59 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Shiro Kawai
08 Jan 2004 22:08 UTC	Re: Couple things...	tb@xxxxxx
08 Jan 2004 22:16 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	tb@xxxxxx
08 Jan 2004 22:45 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 22:58 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 23:04 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 23:28 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	tb@xxxxxx
09 Jan 2004 00:06 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
09 Jan 2004 05:06 UTC	Re: Couple things...	bear
09 Jan 2004 06:42 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Felix Winkelmann
09 Jan 2004 15:04 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Richard Kelsey
09 Jan 2004 18:08 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Bradd W. Szonye
09 Jan 2004 23:30 UTC	Oh.	Jim Blandy
10 Jan 2004 00:01 UTC	Re: Couple things...	bear
10 Jan 2004 15:40 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Matthew Dempsky
10 Jan 2004 16:00 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Michael Sperber
10 Jan 2004 16:37 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Marc Feeley
10 Jan 2004 18:13 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Michael Sperber
10 Jan 2004 18:57 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
10 Jan 2004 20:18 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Michael Sperber
10 Jan 2004 20:44 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Marc Feeley
10 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Richard Kelsey
10 Jan 2004 21:30 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Marc Feeley
10 Jan 2004 21:48 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
10 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
11 Jan 2004 03:10 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 03:52 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Michael Sperber
11 Jan 2004 10:40 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 12:14 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Michael Sperber
11 Jan 2004 17:05 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
11 Jan 2004 17:55 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
11 Jan 2004 23:37 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	tb@xxxxxx
12 Jan 2004 01:07 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Richard Kelsey
12 Jan 2004 02:46 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	tb@xxxxxx
12 Jan 2004 03:55 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Marc Feeley
12 Jan 2004 04:31 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	felix
12 Jan 2004 04:37 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	felix
12 Jan 2004 04:38 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	felix
12 Jan 2004 14:32 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Matthew Dempsky
12 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	felix
12 Jan 2004 21:31 UTC	temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50	Jim Blandy
12 Jan 2004 22:03 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Jim Blandy
12 Jan 2004 22:52 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	felix
13 Jan 2004 01:23 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	tb@xxxxxx
13 Jan 2004 01:25 UTC	Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50	tb@xxxxxx
13 Jan 2004 02:04 UTC	Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50	Tom Lord
13 Jan 2004 02:53 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Richard Kelsey
13 Jan 2004 03:20 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	tb@xxxxxx
13 Jan 2004 06:16 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	bear
13 Jan 2004 21:46 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 06:25 UTC	Re: Pika-style from first principles	Felix Winkelmann
14 Jan 2004 08:08 UTC	Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50	Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 09:06 UTC	Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 18:29 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Per Bothner
14 Jan 2004 18:40 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 18:53 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 19:53 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 20:28 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 20:30 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 20:45 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 21:05 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC	Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50	Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 21:21 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 21:41 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 22:09 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 22:11 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Per Bothner
14 Jan 2004 23:16 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 23:32 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 23:54 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 23:55 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	bear
15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Shiro Kawai
15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Per Bothner
15 Jan 2004 01:07 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	bear
15 Jan 2004 01:26 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Benderjg@xxxxxx
15 Jan 2004 01:26 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Per Bothner
15 Jan 2004 01:44 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Shiro Kawai
15 Jan 2004 01:59 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 02:05 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 02:28 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Shiro Kawai
15 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 02:45 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Marc Feeley
15 Jan 2004 03:37 UTC	Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style	Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 03:51 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Richard Kelsey
15 Jan 2004 08:42 UTC	kind request for a sync()	sebastian.egner@xxxxxx
15 Jan 2004 13:44 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Eric Knauel
15 Jan 2004 17:59 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 18:04 UTC	Re: when GC is permitted	Tom Lord
17 Jan 2004 15:58 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
18 Jan 2004 05:58 UTC	Re: Couple things...	bear
18 Jan 2004 10:18 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
18 Jan 2004 16:21 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Tom Lord
18 Jan 2004 21:09 UTC	Re: Couple things...	bear
18 Jan 2004 21:53 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Tom Lord
19 Jan 2004 01:28 UTC	Re: Couple things...	bear
19 Jan 2004 02:59 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Tom Lord
22 Jan 2004 05:11 UTC	strings draft	Tom Lord
22 Jan 2004 09:46 UTC	Re: strings draft	Shiro Kawai
22 Jan 2004 17:45 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
22 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC	Re: strings draft	bear
23 Jan 2004 02:06 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 02:09 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 02:34 UTC	Re: strings draft	Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 02:44 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 02:48 UTC	Re: strings draft	Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 02:58 UTC	Re: strings draft	Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 03:02 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 03:04 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:07 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 03:12 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:13 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:18 UTC	Re: strings draft	Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 03:28 UTC	Re: strings draft	Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 03:29 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 03:42 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:44 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:45 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 05:03 UTC	Re: strings draft	Shiro Kawai
23 Jan 2004 06:00 UTC	READ-OCTET (Re: strings draft)	Shiro Kawai
23 Jan 2004 07:04 UTC	Re: strings draft	bear
23 Jan 2004 07:20 UTC	Re: strings draft	bear
23 Jan 2004 08:07 UTC	Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Ken Dickey
23 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC	Re: strings draft	Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 12:53 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Ken Dickey
23 Jan 2004 14:14 UTC	Re: strings draft (musings)	Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 17:55 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	bear
23 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 18:52 UTC	Re: strings draft	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 18:56 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Per Bothner
23 Jan 2004 19:31 UTC	Re: strings draft	Bradd W. Szonye
23 Jan 2004 20:01 UTC	Re: strings draft	Matthew Dempsky
23 Jan 2004 20:20 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 20:39 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 20:57 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Per Bothner
23 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC	Re: strings draft	Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 21:57 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 22:52 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 23:35 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 00:15 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 00:45 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC	Re: strings draft	bear
24 Jan 2004 03:26 UTC	Re: strings draft	Shiro Kawai
24 Jan 2004 04:31 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 04:49 UTC	Re: strings draft	Shiro Kawai
24 Jan 2004 06:48 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	tb@xxxxxx
24 Jan 2004 16:10 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Ken Dickey
24 Jan 2004 18:55 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 19:01 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 19:34 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	tb@xxxxxx
24 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC	Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)	Paul Schlie
24 Jan 2004 22:02 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 22:15 UTC	Re: strings draft	Shiro Kawai
24 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC	Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)	Paul Schlie
24 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC	Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)	Tom Lord
25 Jan 2004 00:00 UTC	Re: strings draft	Matthew Dempsky
25 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC	Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]	Tom Lord
25 Jan 2004 07:29 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 01:58 UTC	Re: strings draft	Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC	Re: strings draft	Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC	Re: strings draft	bear
26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 03:00 UTC	Re: strings draft	Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 03:01 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 03:27 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC	Re: strings draft	Shiro Kawai
26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC	Re: strings draft	Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC	Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)	Shiro Kawai
26 Jan 2004 13:13 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)	Matthew Dempsky
26 Jan 2004 13:41 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)	Matthew Dempsky
26 Jan 2004 16:53 UTC	Re: strings draft	Matthew Dempsky
26 Jan 2004 19:04 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)	bear
26 Jan 2004 19:40 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)	Ken Dickey
26 Jan 2004 23:38 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char	Shiro Kawai
27 Jan 2004 00:34 UTC	proposed srfi for extended character sets	Tom Lord
27 Jan 2004 00:40 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)	Paul Schlie
27 Jan 2004 00:44 UTC	Re: strings draft	Tom Lord
27 Jan 2004 05:10 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char	Shiro Kawai
27 Jan 2004 05:37 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char	Tom Lord
27 Jan 2004 06:50 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)	Ken Dickey
27 Jan 2004 08:32 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)	bear
27 Jan 2004 08:35 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char	bear
27 Jan 2004 19:06 UTC	Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)	bear
30 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC	Strings, one last detail.	bear
30 Jan 2004 21:29 UTC	Clarification of SCHEME_GC_PROTECT/SCHEME_GC_UNPROTECT	bear
30 Jan 2004 21:43 UTC	Re: Strings, one last detail.	Shiro Kawai
31 Jan 2004 00:27 UTC	Re: Strings, one last detail.	Tom Lord
31 Jan 2004 20:25 UTC	Re: Strings, one last detail.	bear
31 Jan 2004 20:56 UTC	Re: Strings, one last detail.	Tom Lord