login signup

Date Index - January 2004 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org

01 Jan 2004 15:04 UTC null-terminated strings vs. strings with length Sebastian Egner
03 Jan 2004 16:12 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2004 16:16 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2004 19:42 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
03 Jan 2004 19:54 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
04 Jan 2004 00:51 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 00:54 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 18:11 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
04 Jan 2004 18:42 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
04 Jan 2004 18:51 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
04 Jan 2004 19:25 UTC Re: no constants please felix
04 Jan 2004 20:08 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
04 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 21:43 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 22:13 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 22:59 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 00:50 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 00:55 UTC I don't believe in "(may GC)" Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:05 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:12 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:19 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 11:42 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:07 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:17 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:28 UTC Re: null-terminated strings vs. strings with length Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:45 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Shiro Kawai
05 Jan 2004 16:26 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 16:35 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 17:40 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 17:49 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 17:54 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" bear
05 Jan 2004 18:16 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" bear
05 Jan 2004 18:24 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 19:03 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 19:18 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 19:19 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 21:49 UTC Pika-style from first principles Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 21:53 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 22:00 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 01:37 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 01:39 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 02:15 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
06 Jan 2004 02:29 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 02:31 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 03:10 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
06 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 04:06 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 06:59 UTC Performance Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:15 UTC Portability Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC Re: Portability Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC Restrictions Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:35 UTC Re: Restrictions Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 07:39 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 07:42 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 07:48 UTC Re: Restrictions Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:55 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 08:02 UTC Reliability Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 09:22 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 09:24 UTC Re: Restrictions Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 09:51 UTC Re: Restrictions Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 09:56 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 10:24 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 10:37 UTC Re: Restrictions Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 10:46 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 10:56 UTC A note on process Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 10:57 UTC Re: Restrictions Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 11:25 UTC Re: A note on process Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 11:41 UTC Re: A note on process Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 12:39 UTC Re: A note on process Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 13:10 UTC Re: A note on process Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 13:19 UTC Re: A note on process Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 15:37 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
06 Jan 2004 16:14 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 16:25 UTC scheme_lookup_imported_binding David Van Horn
06 Jan 2004 16:59 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 18:07 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 18:52 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" bear
06 Jan 2004 19:52 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 20:00 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 20:36 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 21:32 UTC Re: A note on process Tom Lord
07 Jan 2004 00:28 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
07 Jan 2004 05:48 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
07 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
07 Jan 2004 22:07 UTC when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
07 Jan 2004 22:25 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Jim Blandy
07 Jan 2004 22:34 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
07 Jan 2004 22:48 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 01:41 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 01:49 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 03:54 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 07:33 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Felix Winkelmann
08 Jan 2004 08:16 UTC Re: Strings/chars Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 08:31 UTC Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 08:40 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 08:58 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Felix Winkelmann
08 Jan 2004 09:45 UTC Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai
08 Jan 2004 16:56 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
08 Jan 2004 17:06 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 19:11 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 19:21 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 19:43 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 19:52 UTC Re: Strings/chars Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 19:57 UTC Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 20:03 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
08 Jan 2004 20:10 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 20:35 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
08 Jan 2004 21:32 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 21:59 UTC Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai
08 Jan 2004 22:08 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
08 Jan 2004 22:16 UTC Re: Strings/chars tb@xxxxxx
08 Jan 2004 22:51 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 23:04 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 23:10 UTC Re: Strings/chars Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 23:28 UTC Re: Strings/chars tb@xxxxxx
08 Jan 2004 23:40 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
09 Jan 2004 05:06 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
09 Jan 2004 06:43 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Felix Winkelmann
09 Jan 2004 15:07 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
09 Jan 2004 18:08 UTC Re: Couple things... Bradd W. Szonye
09 Jan 2004 23:36 UTC Oh. Jim Blandy
10 Jan 2004 00:01 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
10 Jan 2004 16:00 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
10 Jan 2004 16:37 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
10 Jan 2004 18:13 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
10 Jan 2004 18:31 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
10 Jan 2004 20:18 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
10 Jan 2004 20:44 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
10 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
10 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
10 Jan 2004 21:30 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Marc Feeley
10 Jan 2004 21:50 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
10 Jan 2004 22:39 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
11 Jan 2004 10:10 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 10:52 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 12:14 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
11 Jan 2004 16:38 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
11 Jan 2004 17:28 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
11 Jan 2004 17:40 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 23:37 UTC Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx
12 Jan 2004 01:08 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
12 Jan 2004 02:47 UTC Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx
12 Jan 2004 03:56 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Marc Feeley
12 Jan 2004 04:28 UTC Re: when GC is permitted felix
12 Jan 2004 04:34 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles felix
12 Jan 2004 04:36 UTC Re: when GC is permitted felix
12 Jan 2004 21:09 UTC Re: when GC is permitted felix
12 Jan 2004 21:32 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
12 Jan 2004 21:38 UTC temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Jim Blandy
12 Jan 2004 22:10 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
12 Jan 2004 22:49 UTC Re: when GC is permitted felix
13 Jan 2004 01:24 UTC Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx
13 Jan 2004 01:25 UTC Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 tb@xxxxxx
13 Jan 2004 01:37 UTC Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Tom Lord
13 Jan 2004 02:55 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
13 Jan 2004 03:20 UTC Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx
13 Jan 2004 06:16 UTC Re: when GC is permitted bear
13 Jan 2004 21:46 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 06:26 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Felix Winkelmann
14 Jan 2004 08:08 UTC Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 09:06 UTC Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 18:13 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 18:26 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 18:30 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner
14 Jan 2004 19:53 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 20:28 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 20:30 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 20:38 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 20:45 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 20:45 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 21:21 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 21:41 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 22:11 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner
14 Jan 2004 22:49 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 23:04 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 23:54 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 23:55 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style bear
15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner
15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Shiro Kawai
15 Jan 2004 01:07 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style bear
15 Jan 2004 01:26 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Benderjg@xxxxxx
15 Jan 2004 01:27 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner
15 Jan 2004 01:31 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 01:37 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 01:44 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Shiro Kawai
15 Jan 2004 02:08 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 02:28 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Shiro Kawai
15 Jan 2004 02:45 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Marc Feeley
15 Jan 2004 03:10 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 03:52 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
15 Jan 2004 08:46 UTC kind request for a sync() sebastian.egner@xxxxxx
15 Jan 2004 13:45 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Eric Knauel
15 Jan 2004 17:32 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 17:38 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
17 Jan 2004 15:58 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
18 Jan 2004 05:58 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
18 Jan 2004 10:18 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
18 Jan 2004 16:09 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
18 Jan 2004 21:09 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
18 Jan 2004 21:40 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
19 Jan 2004 01:29 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
19 Jan 2004 02:47 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
22 Jan 2004 04:58 UTC strings draft Tom Lord
22 Jan 2004 09:46 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
22 Jan 2004 17:32 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
22 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC Re: strings draft bear
23 Jan 2004 01:53 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 02:10 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 02:29 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 02:44 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 02:48 UTC Re: strings draft Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 02:49 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 02:53 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 02:58 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 03:04 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:12 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:13 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:16 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 03:19 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 03:28 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 03:42 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:44 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:45 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 05:03 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
23 Jan 2004 06:01 UTC READ-OCTET (Re: strings draft) Shiro Kawai
23 Jan 2004 07:04 UTC Re: strings draft bear
23 Jan 2004 07:20 UTC Re: strings draft bear
23 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC Re: strings draft Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 14:15 UTC Re: strings draft (musings) Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 17:02 UTC Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey
23 Jan 2004 17:56 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] bear
23 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 18:53 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 18:56 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Per Bothner
23 Jan 2004 19:31 UTC Re: strings draft Bradd W. Szonye
23 Jan 2004 20:07 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 20:26 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 20:57 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Per Bothner
23 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC Re: strings draft Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 21:44 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 21:47 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey
23 Jan 2004 22:38 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 23:22 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 00:02 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 00:31 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC Re: strings draft bear
24 Jan 2004 03:00 UTC Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky
24 Jan 2004 03:27 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
24 Jan 2004 04:18 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 04:49 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
24 Jan 2004 06:48 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx
24 Jan 2004 18:41 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 18:47 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 19:34 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx
24 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Paul Schlie
24 Jan 2004 21:48 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 22:05 UTC Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 22:16 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
24 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Paul Schlie
25 Jan 2004 01:03 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey
25 Jan 2004 03:01 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
25 Jan 2004 06:59 UTC Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky
25 Jan 2004 07:16 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 01:59 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 02:22 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 02:22 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC Re: strings draft bear
26 Jan 2004 02:48 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 03:00 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
26 Jan 2004 04:58 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Shiro Kawai
26 Jan 2004 19:04 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear
26 Jan 2004 20:12 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Matthew Dempsky
26 Jan 2004 20:40 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Matthew Dempsky
26 Jan 2004 23:39 UTC Re: Octet vs Char Shiro Kawai
26 Jan 2004 23:52 UTC Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky
27 Jan 2004 00:20 UTC proposed srfi for extended character sets Tom Lord
27 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
27 Jan 2004 00:40 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Paul Schlie
27 Jan 2004 04:33 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Ken Dickey
27 Jan 2004 05:12 UTC Re: Octet vs Char Shiro Kawai
27 Jan 2004 05:23 UTC Re: Octet vs Char Tom Lord
27 Jan 2004 08:33 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear
27 Jan 2004 08:35 UTC Re: Octet vs Char bear
27 Jan 2004 15:43 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Ken Dickey
27 Jan 2004 19:06 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear
30 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC Strings, one last detail. bear
30 Jan 2004 21:29 UTC Clarification of SCHEME_GC_PROTECT/SCHEME_GC_UNPROTECT bear
30 Jan 2004 21:43 UTC Re: Strings, one last detail. Shiro Kawai
31 Jan 2004 00:13 UTC Re: Strings, one last detail. Tom Lord
31 Jan 2004 20:26 UTC Re: Strings, one last detail. bear
31 Jan 2004 20:42 UTC Re: Strings, one last detail. Tom Lord