Re: Making SRFI go faster Amirouche Boubekki 25 Apr 2021 10:47 UTC
Le dim. 25 avr. 2021 à 11:33, Lassi Kortela <firstname.lastname@example.org> a écrit : > > As SRFI deadlines approach and the pre-SRFI queue grows, I am once again > asking for your moral support in considering a more lightweight process. You have my support. We agree on the goal to make it easier to contribute to Scheme, and help Scheme progress faster. > In all discussions of this kind, it bears repeating that this is first > and foremost a social issue: It is also a technical issue, the Scheme world is so diverse in terms of implementations and goals that it is difficult to contribute to Scheme without a dedicated Scheme implementation for the purpose of the SRFI process and RnRS. > a group of people have to decide to work together and resolve problems > by talking instead of forking code. That is what happens any time someone copies, and adjusts a sample implementation in their own repository. > The good news is that that's the way we already resolve problems in SRFI. Great! > Would the people around SRFI be interested in formalizing the > lightweight work we already more or less have? I do not understand the question. What needs formalization?