Group Email Manager

login signup

Date Index - May 2013 - srfi-110@srfi.schemers.org

01 May 2013 03:38 UTC FYI: Have a Common Lisp implementation, too David A. Wheeler
01 May 2013 13:20 UTC Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? David A. Wheeler
02 May 2013 04:54 UTC Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
02 May 2013 08:00 UTC Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
02 May 2013 08:46 UTC Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave \\ to always be SPLIT Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
02 May 2013 10:00 UTC scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
02 May 2013 10:01 UTC Re: Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
02 May 2013 12:01 UTC Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens Alan Manuel Gloria
02 May 2013 16:39 UTC Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
02 May 2013 22:24 UTC Re: Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? David A. Wheeler
02 May 2013 22:46 UTC Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions David A. Wheeler
02 May 2013 23:22 UTC Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens David A. Wheeler
02 May 2013 23:52 UTC Re: Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? David A. Wheeler
03 May 2013 00:29 UTC Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
03 May 2013 00:51 UTC Re: Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? David Vanderson
03 May 2013 01:02 UTC spaces and tabs confused? David Vanderson
03 May 2013 02:01 UTC Re: spaces and tabs confused? Alan Manuel Gloria
03 May 2013 21:18 UTC Re: spaces and tabs confused? David A. Wheeler
04 May 2013 03:13 UTC Re: Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave \ to always be SPLIT David A. Wheeler
04 May 2013 20:44 UTC Re: [Readable-discuss] Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave \ to always be SPLIT Arne Babenhauserheide
04 May 2013 22:56 UTC Re: Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? David A. Wheeler
07 May 2013 15:42 UTC Re: Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave to always be SPLIT David A. Wheeler
08 May 2013 12:21 UTC Let's delay release of SRFI-110 David A. Wheeler
14 May 2013 00:47 UTC Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions David A. Wheeler
22 May 2013 14:33 UTC Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy Bill Birch
23 May 2013 13:39 UTC Re: Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy David A. Wheeler
23 May 2013 15:35 UTC sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone
23 May 2013 16:19 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan
23 May 2013 16:32 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone
24 May 2013 03:12 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
24 May 2013 03:55 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
24 May 2013 15:34 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone
24 May 2013 20:02 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan
24 May 2013 20:09 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
24 May 2013 21:35 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone
24 May 2013 22:40 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
24 May 2013 23:13 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone
25 May 2013 03:20 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan
25 May 2013 03:43 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
25 May 2013 04:17 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
25 May 2013 04:26 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
25 May 2013 04:55 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan
25 May 2013 18:14 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
25 May 2013 18:33 UTC Updated SRFI-110 posted! David A. Wheeler
26 May 2013 20:40 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
26 May 2013 22:43 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
26 May 2013 23:26 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone
27 May 2013 00:00 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
27 May 2013 00:29 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
27 May 2013 03:25 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alexey Radul
27 May 2013 04:44 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
27 May 2013 04:51 UTC RE: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Jos Koot
27 May 2013 05:50 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alexey Radul
27 May 2013 06:34 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alan Manuel Gloria
27 May 2013 13:37 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
27 May 2013 13:55 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
27 May 2013 15:14 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
27 May 2013 15:50 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan
27 May 2013 15:51 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone
27 May 2013 15:55 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan
27 May 2013 16:27 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alexey Radul
28 May 2013 04:28 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alan Manuel Gloria
28 May 2013 18:34 UTC Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler
29 May 2013 06:31 UTC More comments, and the ANTLR code is too complex Mark H Weaver
29 May 2013 17:39 UTC Re: More comments, and the ANTLR code is too complex David A. Wheeler
31 May 2013 17:03 UTC Re: More comments, and the ANTLR code is too complex David A. Wheeler