Thread Index - May 2013 - srfi-110@srfi.schemers.org

FYI: Have a Common Lisp implementation, too David A. Wheeler (01 May 2013 03:38 UTC)

Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? David A. Wheeler (01 May 2013 13:20 UTC)

(missing)

Re: Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (02 May 2013 10:07 UTC)

Re: Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? David A. Wheeler (02 May 2013 23:52 UTC)

spaces and tabs confused? David Vanderson (03 May 2013 01:08 UTC)

Re: spaces and tabs confused? Alan Manuel Gloria (03 May 2013 02:01 UTC)

Re: spaces and tabs confused? David A. Wheeler (03 May 2013 21:18 UTC)

Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (02 May 2013 04:54 UTC)

Re: Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? David A. Wheeler (02 May 2013 22:24 UTC)

Re: Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? David Vanderson (03 May 2013 00:57 UTC)

Re: Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? David A. Wheeler (04 May 2013 22:56 UTC)

Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (02 May 2013 08:00 UTC)

Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions David A. Wheeler (02 May 2013 22:46 UTC)

Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions David A. Wheeler (14 May 2013 00:47 UTC)

Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave \\ to always be SPLIT Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (02 May 2013 08:46 UTC)

Re: Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave \ to always be SPLIT David A. Wheeler (04 May 2013 03:13 UTC)

Re: [Readable-discuss] Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave \ to always be SPLIT Arne Babenhauserheide (04 May 2013 20:50 UTC)

scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (02 May 2013 10:07 UTC)

Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens Alan Manuel Gloria (02 May 2013 12:01 UTC)

Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (02 May 2013 16:39 UTC)

Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens David A. Wheeler (02 May 2013 23:22 UTC)

Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (03 May 2013 00:30 UTC)

Re: Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? David A. Wheeler (02 May 2013 23:52 UTC)

Re: Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave to always be SPLIT David A. Wheeler (07 May 2013 15:42 UTC)

Let's delay release of SRFI-110 David A. Wheeler (08 May 2013 12:21 UTC)

Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy Bill Birch (22 May 2013 15:03 UTC)

Re: Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy David A. Wheeler (23 May 2013 13:39 UTC)

sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (23 May 2013 16:08 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (23 May 2013 16:19 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (23 May 2013 16:32 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (24 May 2013 03:55 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (24 May 2013 03:12 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (24 May 2013 15:34 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (24 May 2013 20:02 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (24 May 2013 20:09 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (24 May 2013 21:35 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (24 May 2013 22:40 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (24 May 2013 23:13 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (25 May 2013 03:43 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (25 May 2013 03:20 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (25 May 2013 04:17 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (25 May 2013 04:27 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (25 May 2013 04:55 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (25 May 2013 18:14 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (26 May 2013 23:26 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 00:29 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone (27 May 2013 15:51 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alan Manuel Gloria (28 May 2013 04:28 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (28 May 2013 18:34 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (26 May 2013 20:40 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (26 May 2013 22:43 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 00:00 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alexey Radul (27 May 2013 03:32 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 04:44 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alexey Radul (27 May 2013 05:50 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alan Manuel Gloria (27 May 2013 06:34 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 15:14 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 13:55 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alexey Radul (27 May 2013 16:27 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (27 May 2013 15:55 UTC)

RE: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Jos Koot (27 May 2013 04:57 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler (27 May 2013 13:37 UTC)

Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan (27 May 2013 15:50 UTC)

Updated SRFI-110 posted! David A. Wheeler (25 May 2013 18:33 UTC)

More comments, and the ANTLR code is too complex Mark H Weaver (29 May 2013 07:04 UTC)

Re: More comments, and the ANTLR code is too complex David A. Wheeler (29 May 2013 17:39 UTC)

Re: More comments, and the ANTLR code is too complex David A. Wheeler (31 May 2013 17:03 UTC)