Thread Index - May 2013 - srfi-110@srfi.schemers.org

To perform a single character wildcard search use the "?" symbol. To perform a multiple character wildcard search use the "*" symbol.

FYI: Have a Common Lisp implementation, too David A. Wheeler 01 May 2013 03:38 UTC
Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? David A. Wheeler 01 May 2013 13:20 UTC
(missing)
Re: Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? beni.cherniavsky@xxxxxx 02 May 2013 10:01 UTC
Re: Is SRFI-110 ready for final release? David A. Wheeler 02 May 2013 23:52 UTC
spaces and tabs confused? David Vanderson 03 May 2013 01:02 UTC
Re: spaces and tabs confused? Alan Manuel Gloria 03 May 2013 02:01 UTC
Re: spaces and tabs confused? David A. Wheeler 03 May 2013 21:18 UTC
Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? beni.cherniavsky@xxxxxx 02 May 2013 04:54 UTC
Re: Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? David A. Wheeler 02 May 2013 22:24 UTC
Re: Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? David Vanderson 03 May 2013 00:51 UTC
Re: Why forbid ! in whitespace-only line? David A. Wheeler 04 May 2013 22:56 UTC
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions beni.cherniavsky@xxxxxx 02 May 2013 08:00 UTC
Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions David A. Wheeler 02 May 2013 22:46 UTC
Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions David A. Wheeler 14 May 2013 00:47 UTC
Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave \\ to always be SPLIT beni.cherniavsky@xxxxxx 02 May 2013 08:46 UTC
Re: Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave \ to always be SPLIT David A. Wheeler 04 May 2013 03:13 UTC
Re: [Readable-discuss] Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave \ to always be SPLIT Arne Babenhauserheide 04 May 2013 20:44 UTC
scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens beni.cherniavsky@xxxxxx 02 May 2013 10:00 UTC
Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens Alan Manuel Gloria 02 May 2013 12:01 UTC
Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens beni.cherniavsky@xxxxxx 02 May 2013 16:39 UTC
Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens David A. Wheeler 02 May 2013 23:22 UTC
Re: scope of #!sweet and friends inside parens beni.cherniavsky@xxxxxx 03 May 2013 00:29 UTC
Re: Proposal: make $ serve as GROUP, leave to always be SPLIT David A. Wheeler 07 May 2013 15:42 UTC
Let's delay release of SRFI-110 David A. Wheeler 08 May 2013 12:21 UTC
Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy Bill Birch 22 May 2013 14:33 UTC
Re: Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy David A. Wheeler 23 May 2013 13:39 UTC
sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone 23 May 2013 15:35 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan 23 May 2013 16:19 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone 23 May 2013 16:32 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 24 May 2013 03:55 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 24 May 2013 03:12 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone 24 May 2013 15:34 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan 24 May 2013 20:02 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 24 May 2013 20:09 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone 24 May 2013 21:35 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 24 May 2013 22:40 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone 24 May 2013 23:13 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 25 May 2013 03:43 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan 25 May 2013 03:20 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 25 May 2013 04:17 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 25 May 2013 04:26 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan 25 May 2013 04:55 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 25 May 2013 18:14 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone 26 May 2013 23:26 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 27 May 2013 00:29 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John David Stone 27 May 2013 15:51 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alan Manuel Gloria 28 May 2013 04:28 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 28 May 2013 18:34 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic beni.cherniavsky@xxxxxx 26 May 2013 20:40 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 26 May 2013 22:43 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 27 May 2013 00:00 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic axofch@xxxxxx 27 May 2013 03:25 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 27 May 2013 04:44 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic axofch@xxxxxx 27 May 2013 05:50 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Alan Manuel Gloria 27 May 2013 06:34 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 27 May 2013 15:14 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 27 May 2013 13:55 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic axofch@xxxxxx 27 May 2013 16:27 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan 27 May 2013 15:55 UTC
RE: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic Jos Koot 27 May 2013 04:51 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic David A. Wheeler 27 May 2013 13:37 UTC
Re: sweet-expressions are not homoiconic John Cowan 27 May 2013 15:50 UTC
Updated SRFI-110 posted! David A. Wheeler 25 May 2013 18:33 UTC
More comments, and the ANTLR code is too complex Mark H Weaver 29 May 2013 06:31 UTC
Re: More comments, and the ANTLR code is too complex David A. Wheeler 29 May 2013 17:39 UTC
Re: More comments, and the ANTLR code is too complex David A. Wheeler 31 May 2013 17:03 UTC