It's good start, but I was expecting something more informal. Right now it's
little bit less informal as SRFI but still you need to have document in
specific format, and you have a proces that you need to follow if you
want take part in discussion. It would probably be hard for people to jump and
comments. As you can see SRFI people comment on the mailing list and I think
that if this will be not as easy as Reddit people will not use it.

Just a tip: why don't you write the question what people think about this
on Reddit instead of maling list, there is limited number of people in
mailing list. Right now most people will have no idea that something like
this exist and it will be really hard to them to find out.

In current word you need to market your ideas if you want them to spread.

On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 00:25:25 +0200
Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote:

> There's now a bare-bones website at https://groups.scheme.org/review/.
>
> To get going, I wrote the first drafts of two proposals:
>
> 2022-1: Scheme Review (a meta document about the process itself)
>
> 2022-2: Symbols as strings (a simple library with spec and source code)
>
> Source for the proposals is at https://gitea.scheme.org/review
>
> Source for the metadata and front page is at
> https://gitea.scheme.org/groups/review
>
> I hope someone is sufficiently motivated to submit a draft about their
> pet topic (I have loads of them, but will hold back for now). It would
> be interesting to see how the experiment will play out.
>
> Comments of all kinds are welcome. Let me know if Gitea is an impediment.

--
Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Senior Front-End Developer
https://jcubic.pl/me