Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(01 Dec 2022 22:25 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
John Cowan
(02 Dec 2022 12:10 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Marc Feeley
(02 Dec 2022 12:16 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(02 Dec 2022 13:24 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(02 Dec 2022 13:37 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(02 Dec 2022 14:58 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(02 Dec 2022 15:10 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(02 Dec 2022 16:24 UTC)
|
Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
John Cowan
(03 Dec 2022 22:07 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(03 Dec 2022 22:39 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Arthur A. Gleckler
(03 Dec 2022 23:25 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(04 Dec 2022 00:14 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
elf
(04 Dec 2022 00:50 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(04 Dec 2022 09:34 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
elf
(04 Dec 2022 10:01 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(04 Dec 2022 11:07 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
elf
(04 Dec 2022 11:44 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Arthur A. Gleckler
(04 Dec 2022 05:15 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Vladimir Nikishkin
(04 Dec 2022 06:27 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Arthur A. Gleckler
(04 Dec 2022 06:31 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(05 Dec 2022 13:28 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
elf
(04 Dec 2022 07:13 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Vladimir Nikishkin
(04 Dec 2022 07:28 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(04 Dec 2022 09:40 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(05 Dec 2022 13:16 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
elf
(04 Dec 2022 09:41 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Vladimir Nikishkin
(04 Dec 2022 10:06 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
elf
(04 Dec 2022 10:15 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Vladimir Nikishkin
(04 Dec 2022 10:44 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(04 Dec 2022 09:57 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
elf
(04 Dec 2022 10:59 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(05 Dec 2022 20:20 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(04 Dec 2022 18:01 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(04 Dec 2022 22:09 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
elf
(05 Dec 2022 13:31 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(05 Dec 2022 13:53 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(05 Dec 2022 13:59 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Arvydas Silanskas
(05 Dec 2022 16:43 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(05 Dec 2022 17:44 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Dec 2022 00:15 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(05 Dec 2022 18:08 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(05 Dec 2022 18:25 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review vs. SRFIs
John Cowan
(05 Dec 2022 03:47 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(02 Dec 2022 18:18 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Arthur A. Gleckler
(02 Dec 2022 18:34 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(02 Dec 2022 18:39 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(02 Dec 2022 18:50 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(02 Dec 2022 21:33 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(02 Dec 2022 22:16 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(02 Dec 2022 22:34 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped Jakub T. Jankiewicz (03 Dec 2022 11:24 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(03 Dec 2022 13:47 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(03 Dec 2022 14:05 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(03 Dec 2022 15:04 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme Review bootstrapped
Lassi Kortela
(03 Dec 2022 15:22 UTC)
|
On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 00:34:19 +0200 Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote: > > Sure, but how others will create documents? Will they need to ask for > > permission and be added to gitea? > > If the discussions are had on Gitea, yes. > > Registering to Gitea should take <5 minutes. If people lack the patience > to do that, how can they write coherent proposals? If you want to look at process different than Reddit, I've recently was asked to present on FOSDEM and the submission was something that was simple. https://penta.fosdem.org/submission/FOSDEM23/ Yes you needed to register but no one need to give you write permission to create a proposal. There are no human in the process of creating a proposal. How many people do you think will ask someone for permission to start a discussion? Registering to Gitea is ok, but asking to have write permission to git repository is not ok, IMHO. Unless you can do the same what on GitHub, create account, fork and create a PR. I don't know Gitea. But this need to be documented the same as on FOSDEM page where you even have instruction that you need to register and login. As long as the process of creating proposal is as simple as following the steps, I'm ok. -- Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Senior Front-End Developer https://jcubic.pl/me