Date Index - August 2020 - srfi-198@srfi.schemers.org

01 Aug 2020 01:57 UTC	Re: Establishing a Scheme registry	John Cowan
01 Aug 2020 03:48 UTC	Re: Establishing a Scheme registry	John Cowan
01 Aug 2020 06:28 UTC	Re: Establishing a Scheme registry	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
01 Aug 2020 13:19 UTC	Re: Establishing a Scheme registry	John Cowan
01 Aug 2020 13:47 UTC	Re: Establishing a Scheme registry	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
01 Aug 2020 13:54 UTC	Re: Establishing a Scheme registry	Amirouche Boubekki
01 Aug 2020 19:50 UTC	Re: Establishing a Scheme registry	Lassi Kortela
01 Aug 2020 20:10 UTC	Re: Abstract or concrete data type for foreign error object?	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 03:40 UTC	Re: How would we use BCP 47 strings in a simple way?	John Cowan
02 Aug 2020 06:49 UTC	Keyword support in SRFI 198	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 06:58 UTC	Re: Keyword support in SRFI 198	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 07:07 UTC	Re: Keyword support in SRFI 198	Shiro Kawai
02 Aug 2020 07:40 UTC	Re: Keyword support in SRFI 198	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 08:34 UTC	Re: How would we use BCP 47 strings in a simple way?	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 09:27 UTC	Re: How would we use BCP 47 strings in a simple way?	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 09:36 UTC	Re: How would we use BCP 47 strings in a simple way?	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 09:51 UTC	Re: How would we use BCP 47 strings in a simple way?	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 11:35 UTC	SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 12:21 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	hga@xxxxxx
02 Aug 2020 13:21 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	Lassi Kortela
02 Aug 2020 15:00 UTC	Re: Keyword support in SRFI 198	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
02 Aug 2020 15:04 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	hga@xxxxxx
03 Aug 2020 16:34 UTC	Foreign errors are not necessarily errors	Lassi Kortela
03 Aug 2020 16:38 UTC	Re: Foreign errors are not necessarily errors	John Cowan
03 Aug 2020 16:46 UTC	Re: HTTP error codes	hga@xxxxxx
03 Aug 2020 16:49 UTC	Re: Foreign errors are not necessarily errors	Lassi Kortela
03 Aug 2020 16:53 UTC	Re: Foreign errors are not necessarily errors	John Cowan
03 Aug 2020 17:03 UTC	Re: Foreign errors are not necessarily errors	Lassi Kortela
03 Aug 2020 17:04 UTC	Re: HTTP error codes	John Cowan
03 Aug 2020 17:06 UTC	Re: HTTP error codes	John Cowan
03 Aug 2020 17:15 UTC	Complexity of SRFI 198 interface and naming	Lassi Kortela
03 Aug 2020 17:52 UTC	Re: Complexity of SRFI 198 interface and naming	hga@xxxxxx
03 Aug 2020 17:53 UTC	Re: Complexity of SRFI 198 interface and naming	John Cowan
03 Aug 2020 18:06 UTC	Re: Complexity of SRFI 198 interface and naming	Lassi Kortela
03 Aug 2020 18:12 UTC	Re: Complexity of SRFI 198 interface and naming	Lassi Kortela
04 Aug 2020 15:52 UTC	Re: Complexity of SRFI 198 interface and naming	John Cowan
04 Aug 2020 16:24 UTC	Re: Complexity of SRFI 198 interface and naming	hga@xxxxxx
04 Aug 2020 16:35 UTC	Re: Complexity of SRFI 198 interface and naming	Lassi Kortela
05 Aug 2020 02:30 UTC	Re: Complexity of SRFI 198 interface and naming	John Cowan
05 Aug 2020 06:13 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	John Cowan
05 Aug 2020 10:33 UTC	Foreign status objects for syslog and other logging frameworks	Lassi Kortela
05 Aug 2020 13:10 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	hga@xxxxxx
05 Aug 2020 15:23 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	Lassi Kortela
05 Aug 2020 15:59 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	hga@xxxxxx
05 Aug 2020 16:17 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	Lassi Kortela
06 Aug 2020 03:22 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	John Cowan
06 Aug 2020 03:49 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	John Cowan
06 Aug 2020 04:30 UTC	Re: How would we use BCP 47 strings in a simple way?	John Cowan
09 Aug 2020 17:09 UTC	Re: two items	hga@xxxxxx
09 Aug 2020 18:29 UTC	Re: two items	John Cowan
09 Aug 2020 19:46 UTC	SRFI 198 Foreign interface Status Handling, general and for the purposes of SRFI 170	hga@xxxxxx
09 Aug 2020 21:01 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 Foreign interface Status Handling, general and for the purposes of SRFI 170	Lassi Kortela
09 Aug 2020 21:29 UTC	Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 00:39 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 Foreign interface Status Handling, general and for the purposes of SRFI 170	hga@xxxxxx
10 Aug 2020 00:40 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 Foreign interface Status Handling, general and for the purposes of SRFI 170	John Cowan
10 Aug 2020 00:52 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 Foreign interface Status Handling, general and for the purposes of SRFI 170	hga@xxxxxx
10 Aug 2020 00:55 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 Foreign interface Status Handling, general and for the purposes of SRFI 170	John Cowan
10 Aug 2020 01:02 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	John Cowan
10 Aug 2020 06:48 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 07:03 UTC	SQLSTATE	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 07:11 UTC	Any alphanumeric errors anywhere?	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 07:15 UTC	Re: Any alphanumeric errors anywhere?	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 07:42 UTC	Re: Any alphanumeric errors anywhere?	Göran Weinholt
10 Aug 2020 08:29 UTC	VMS errors	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 11:32 UTC	libsodium error codes	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 13:11 UTC	Localization and a new STFI 198 draft to base it upon	hga@xxxxxx
10 Aug 2020 14:07 UTC	Re: Localization and a new STFI 198 draft to base it upon	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 15:10 UTC	What to do for bad arguments to foreign-status-plist?	hga@xxxxxx
10 Aug 2020 15:14 UTC	Re: What to do for bad arguments to foreign-status-plist?	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 15:28 UTC	Re: What to do for bad arguments to foreign-status-plist?	hga@xxxxxx
10 Aug 2020 15:38 UTC	Re: What to do for bad arguments to foreign-status-plist?	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 20:35 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	John Cowan
10 Aug 2020 21:30 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	Lassi Kortela
10 Aug 2020 22:11 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	hga@xxxxxx
11 Aug 2020 02:44 UTC	Re: VMS errors	John Cowan
11 Aug 2020 03:48 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	John Cowan
11 Aug 2020 06:50 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	Lassi Kortela
11 Aug 2020 17:42 UTC	Sources for the new Common Lisp condition system book	Lassi Kortela
12 Aug 2020 12:01 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 12:06 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 12:38 UTC	Re: What to do for bad arguments to foreign-status-plist?	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 12:48 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	John Cowan
12 Aug 2020 12:49 UTC	Re: Localization and a new STFI 198 draft to base it upon	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 12:50 UTC	Special properties of the 'set key	John Cowan
12 Aug 2020 12:54 UTC	Re: Localization and a new STFI 198 draft to base it upon	John Cowan
12 Aug 2020 12:58 UTC	Re: What to do for bad arguments to foreign-status-plist?	John Cowan
12 Aug 2020 13:12 UTC	SRFI 198 proposal to change 'set to 'facility	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 13:18 UTC	Re: Special properties of the 'set key	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 15:14 UTC	plist pre-SRFI	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 15:20 UTC	Re: plist pre-SRFI	John Cowan
12 Aug 2020 15:53 UTC	Re: plist pre-SRFI	John Cowan
12 Aug 2020 15:58 UTC	Re: plist pre-SRFI	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 16:32 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 16:55 UTC	Re: SRFI 198: clear enough for next draft?	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 16:59 UTC	Re: plist pre-SRFI	John Cowan
12 Aug 2020 17:34 UTC	Re: plist pre-SRFI	hga@xxxxxx
12 Aug 2020 19:37 UTC	Re: plist pre-SRFI	John Cowan
12 Aug 2020 20:03 UTC	Use of SRFI 198 in SRFI 170	hga@xxxxxx
13 Aug 2020 06:58 UTC	Re: Special properties of the 'set key	Lassi Kortela
13 Aug 2020 10:55 UTC	Re: Special properties of the 'set key	hga@xxxxxx
13 Aug 2020 18:46 UTC	On POSIX errnos using 'number as a key, and SRFI 198 not defining that, 'code, etc. as standards at its level	hga@xxxxxx
13 Aug 2020 20:31 UTC	Re: On POSIX errnos using 'number as a key, and SRFI 198 not defining that, 'code, etc. as standards at its level	John Cowan
13 Aug 2020 21:04 UTC	Re: On POSIX errnos using 'number as a key, and SRFI 198 not defining that, 'code, etc. as standards at its level	hga@xxxxxx
14 Aug 2020 04:28 UTC	Re: Special properties of the 'set key	John Cowan
14 Aug 2020 07:37 UTC	Re: Special properties of the 'set key	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 08:20 UTC	Re: Special properties of the 'set key	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 08:47 UTC	Sub-set key and zero/nonzero success/failure status sets	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 09:59 UTC	Design by construction	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 12:22 UTC	R6RS foreign-error sketch	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 13:30 UTC	Re: What to do for bad arguments to foreign-status-plist?	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 13:46 UTC	Promise objects	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 14:03 UTC	Re: Promise objects	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 15:12 UTC	Clearing up confusion	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 15:27 UTC	Re: Clearing up confusion, and Windows errors as POSIX errno's	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 15:43 UTC	Compound conditions and foreign status objects	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 15:54 UTC	Semantic property names and static vs dynamic types	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 15:57 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 16:35 UTC	Good-enough localization?	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 22:06 UTC	Re: Semantic property names and static vs dynamic types	John Cowan
14 Aug 2020 22:07 UTC	Re: Good-enough localization?	John Cowan
14 Aug 2020 22:10 UTC	Re: Good-enough localization?	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 22:10 UTC	Re: Good-enough localization?	John Cowan
14 Aug 2020 22:16 UTC	Re: Good-enough localization?	Lassi Kortela
14 Aug 2020 22:18 UTC	Re: Compound conditions and foreign status objects	John Cowan
14 Aug 2020 22:30 UTC	Re: Good-enough localization?	John Cowan
14 Aug 2020 23:28 UTC	Re: Compound conditions and foreign status objects	Shiro Kawai
15 Aug 2020 00:49 UTC	Re: Final review of johnwcowan/srfi-170/srfi-170.html, part 2 starting with 3.3 File system, create-temp-file	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 00:54 UTC	Re: Clearing up confusion	John Cowan
15 Aug 2020 01:46 UTC	Re: Another sketch of foreign-status abstraction in Common Lisp	John Cowan
15 Aug 2020 10:46 UTC	Re: Clearing up confusion	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
15 Aug 2020 10:57 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 11:16 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
15 Aug 2020 11:20 UTC	Re: Compound conditions and foreign status objects	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
15 Aug 2020 11:31 UTC	Re: Another sketch of foreign-status abstraction in Common Lisp	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 11:46 UTC	Clearing up the previous clearing up	Lassi Kortela
15 Aug 2020 11:50 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 12:09 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Lassi Kortela
15 Aug 2020 12:16 UTC	Another sketch of foreign-status abstraction in Common Lisp (sent to the wrong mailing list)	Lassi Kortela
15 Aug 2020 12:42 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 13:10 UTC	Synthetic errno values	Lassi Kortela
15 Aug 2020 15:03 UTC	Re: Clearing up the previous clearing up	John Cowan
15 Aug 2020 15:19 UTC	Re: Synthetic errno values	John Cowan
15 Aug 2020 15:34 UTC	Re: Synthetic errno values	Lassi Kortela
15 Aug 2020 16:02 UTC	Re: Synthetic errno values	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 16:25 UTC	Re: Solving the symbol-vs-number conundrum	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 16:31 UTC	Re: Compound conditions and foreign status objects	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 16:45 UTC	Re: Compound conditions and foreign status objects	John Cowan
15 Aug 2020 16:46 UTC	Re: Compound conditions and foreign status objects	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
15 Aug 2020 16:49 UTC	Re: Compound conditions and foreign status objects	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
15 Aug 2020 16:50 UTC	Re: Clearing up confusion, and Windows errors as POSIX errno's	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 17:07 UTC	Re: Compound conditions and foreign status objects	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
15 Aug 2020 18:35 UTC	Updating Scheme Registry with the latest ideas for SRFI 198	Lassi Kortela
15 Aug 2020 18:59 UTC	A better name for 'set, a need for a reflection API for SRFI 198??	hga@xxxxxx
15 Aug 2020 20:22 UTC	Re: Clearing up confusion	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 01:11 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Shiro Kawai
16 Aug 2020 02:26 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 02:30 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Shiro Kawai
16 Aug 2020 02:43 UTC	Split SRFI 198 from generic debugging/inspection?	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 06:31 UTC	Re: A better name for 'set, a need for a reflection API for SRFI 198??	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 07:58 UTC	Re: Synthetic errno values	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 08:52 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Göran Weinholt
16 Aug 2020 09:01 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 09:06 UTC	Re: Split SRFI 198 from generic debugging/inspection?	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 09:10 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Shiro Kawai
16 Aug 2020 09:40 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Göran Weinholt
16 Aug 2020 10:20 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 11:17 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Shiro Kawai
16 Aug 2020 11:21 UTC	Passing symbols to say where errors came from?	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 11:29 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Shiro Kawai
16 Aug 2020 11:29 UTC	Continuation marks and SRFI 198	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 12:18 UTC	Re: posix-error and a list of scheme procedure arguments	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 12:30 UTC	Re: A better name for 'set, a need for a reflection API for SRFI 198??	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 12:39 UTC	Re: Synthetic errno values	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 12:41 UTC	Re: A better name for 'set, a need for a reflection API for SRFI 198??	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 12:51 UTC	Re: Continuation marks and SRFI 198	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 13:01 UTC	Re: Split SRFI 198 from generic debugging/inspection?	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 13:07 UTC	Re: Synthetic errno values	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 13:18 UTC	Re: A better name for 'set, a need for a reflection API for SRFI 198??	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 13:36 UTC	SRFI 35 (Conditions), SRFI 198, and do we have a compatible vision	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 13:47 UTC	Matching what other languages give in SRFI 170 errors	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 13:49 UTC	Re: SRFI 35 (Conditions), SRFI 198, and do we have a compatible vision	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 14:06 UTC	Do we have a compatible vision for SRFI 198	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 14:13 UTC	Re: SRFI 35 (Conditions), SRFI 198, and do we have a compatible vision	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 14:22 UTC	Re: Do we have a compatible vision for SRFI 198	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 14:23 UTC	Re: Do we have a compatible vision for SRFI 198	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 14:23 UTC	SRFI 35 compound conditions	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 14:26 UTC	Re: SRFI 35 compound conditions	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 14:30 UTC	raise-foreign-error	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 14:44 UTC	Decision on foreign-status constructor and accesor syntax	Lassi Kortela
16 Aug 2020 15:04 UTC	Re: raise-foreign-error	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 15:19 UTC	Re: Decision on foreign-status constructor and accesor syntax	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 15:26 UTC	Re: raise-foreign-error	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 15:31 UTC	Re: Decision on foreign-status constructor and accesor syntax	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 16:01 UTC	Re: raise-foreign-error	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 17:12 UTC	Re: Decision on foreign-status constructor and accesor syntax	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 17:19 UTC	Re: Decision on foreign-status constructor and accesor syntax	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 17:24 UTC	On the messiness of alists for lists as values	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 17:31 UTC	Re: Decision on foreign-status constructor and accesor syntax	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 17:39 UTC	Re: On the messiness of alists for lists as values	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 17:52 UTC	Re: On the messiness of alists for lists as values	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 18:39 UTC	Re: On the messiness of alists for lists as values	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
16 Aug 2020 19:04 UTC	Re: On the messiness of alists for lists as values	hga@xxxxxx
16 Aug 2020 22:26 UTC	Re: On the messiness of alists for lists as values	John Cowan
17 Aug 2020 02:35 UTC	Re: raise-foreign-error	John Cowan
17 Aug 2020 02:51 UTC	Re: Do we have a compatible vision for SRFI 198	John Cowan
17 Aug 2020 06:11 UTC	Re: Matching what other languages give in SRFI 170 errors	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
17 Aug 2020 10:07 UTC	PC-Scheme for DOS	Lassi Kortela
17 Aug 2020 10:10 UTC	Re: Matching what other languages give in SRFI 170 errors	Lassi Kortela
17 Aug 2020 10:52 UTC	Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	Lassi Kortela
17 Aug 2020 11:58 UTC	Re: raise-foreign-error	hga@xxxxxx
17 Aug 2020 12:06 UTC	Re: raise-foreign-error	Lassi Kortela
17 Aug 2020 12:10 UTC	R6RS condition type hierarchy	Lassi Kortela
17 Aug 2020 13:40 UTC	Re: R6RS condition type hierarchy	John Cowan
17 Aug 2020 14:01 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	John Cowan
17 Aug 2020 14:19 UTC	Re: raise-foreign-error	hga@xxxxxx
17 Aug 2020 14:47 UTC	Re: R6RS condition type hierarchy	Lassi Kortela
17 Aug 2020 14:56 UTC	Re: R6RS condition type hierarchy	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
17 Aug 2020 15:05 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	hga@xxxxxx
17 Aug 2020 15:30 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	John Cowan
17 Aug 2020 15:38 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	Lassi Kortela
17 Aug 2020 15:38 UTC	New draft (#3) of SRFI 198: Foreign Interface Status [renamed]	Arthur A. Gleckler
17 Aug 2020 15:51 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	Lassi Kortela
17 Aug 2020 15:51 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
17 Aug 2020 16:02 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	Lassi Kortela
17 Aug 2020 16:09 UTC	Why plists?	John Cowan
17 Aug 2020 16:11 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	hga@xxxxxx
17 Aug 2020 16:17 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
17 Aug 2020 16:25 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	hga@xxxxxx
17 Aug 2020 16:33 UTC	Re: Should foreign-status properties be divided into sets or not?	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
17 Aug 2020 17:06 UTC	Re: Passing symbols to say where errors came from?	John Cowan
17 Aug 2020 17:28 UTC	Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 198: Foreign Interface Status [renamed]	Arthur A. Gleckler
17 Aug 2020 18:43 UTC	Re: Passing symbols to say where errors came from?	hga@xxxxxx
17 Aug 2020 19:05 UTC	SRFI 170 versus process SRFI	John Cowan
17 Aug 2020 19:27 UTC	Re: Why plists?	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
17 Aug 2020 19:36 UTC	Re: Why plists?	hga@xxxxxx
17 Aug 2020 20:42 UTC	Re: Why plists?	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
17 Aug 2020 21:10 UTC	Re: Why plists?	hga@xxxxxx
17 Aug 2020 22:05 UTC	Re: Passing symbols to say where errors came from?	Shiro Kawai
17 Aug 2020 22:20 UTC	Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 198: Foreign Interface Status [renamed]	Arthur A. Gleckler
18 Aug 2020 05:45 UTC	Re: Why plists?	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
18 Aug 2020 06:09 UTC	Re: Passing symbols to say where errors came from?	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
18 Aug 2020 09:24 UTC	Re: Why plists?	hga@xxxxxx
18 Aug 2020 09:50 UTC	Re: Why plists?	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
18 Aug 2020 19:18 UTC	Re: Why plists?	John Cowan
18 Aug 2020 19:46 UTC	Changes to SRFI 170	John Cowan
18 Aug 2020 20:00 UTC	Re: Why plists?	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
18 Aug 2020 20:16 UTC	Re: Why plists?	John Cowan
18 Aug 2020 22:32 UTC	author Github links for 170, 178, 181, 194, 196, and 198	Arthur A. Gleckler
18 Aug 2020 23:14 UTC	Re: author Github links for 170, 178, 181, 194, 196, and 198	Arthur A. Gleckler
19 Aug 2020 11:30 UTC	Arguments	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
30 Aug 2020 12:36 UTC	SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	hga@xxxxxx
30 Aug 2020 14:01 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 14:24 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	hga@xxxxxx
30 Aug 2020 14:52 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 14:55 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	John Cowan
30 Aug 2020 15:22 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 15:23 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	hga@xxxxxx
30 Aug 2020 15:35 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 15:44 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 15:45 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	hga@xxxxxx
30 Aug 2020 16:02 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
30 Aug 2020 16:05 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	John Cowan
30 Aug 2020 16:06 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 16:38 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 16:56 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 17:05 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 17:33 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	hga@xxxxxx
30 Aug 2020 17:47 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	John Cowan
30 Aug 2020 17:54 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	John Cowan
30 Aug 2020 18:26 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Arthur A. Gleckler
30 Aug 2020 18:56 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	John Cowan
30 Aug 2020 18:57 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 18:59 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 19:09 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Arthur A. Gleckler
30 Aug 2020 19:28 UTC	Don't panic	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 19:34 UTC	Re: Don't panic	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
30 Aug 2020 19:44 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
30 Aug 2020 19:57 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	Lassi Kortela
30 Aug 2020 20:00 UTC	Re: Don't panic	Arthur A. Gleckler
30 Aug 2020 20:09 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	John Cowan
30 Aug 2020 20:13 UTC	Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry	hga@xxxxxx
30 Aug 2020 22:20 UTC	What to do if two conventions define different meanings to the same required key?	hga@xxxxxx